XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns   
   From: MeanDog@NoLefties.dot   
      
   On Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:42:18 -0700, nickname unavailable   
   <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> wrote:   
      
   >On 10/15/2025 4:26 PM, ImagineNoleftists wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 15:45:04 -0700, nickname unavailable   
   >> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 10/15/2025 1:29 PM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:27:43 -0700, nickname unavailable   
   >>>> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> in alt.atheism   
   >>>> with message-id  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 10/15/2025 12:29 AM, Attila wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:25:53 -0400, scooter, the drunken Virginia   
   camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and   
   lied:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>  in alt.atheism   
   >>>>>> with message-id <10cmt7j$3bi15$1@dont-email.me> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> However, while we are talking about crimes and people responsible for   
   them..   
   >>>>>>> Those members of state and local government who not only interfered   
   with   
   >>>>>>> border security,   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> That did not happen.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I agree.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You're wrong. No state or local officials "interfered with border   
   security" in   
   >>>>> any way.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They are interfering with the identification and deportation   
   >>>> of illegals.  They have provided aid and support openly to   
   >>>> them.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's a lie. They're not doing any of that. They're refusing to assist   
   >>> ICEstapo, but they're under no obligation to assist.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>>> One purpose of border security is to insure no enters   
   >>>> illegally.   
   >>>   
   >>> Not the responsibility of state and local officials.   
   >>   
   >> ICE and border security are Federal   
   >   
   >That's what I said, bicycle-less Dummy. That's why state and local officials   
   >have no obligation to participate.   
   >   
   >>>>>> They should be tried as accessories after the fact   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No. They neither committed any crime nor aided and abetted anyone in   
   committing   
   >>>>> crimes.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Being here legally is a crime   
   >>>   
   >>> No, it is not. I've already instructed you on that point.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >>>> and they are abetting and supporting illegals in the commission of that   
   crime.   
   >>>   
   >>> No crime.   
   >>   
   >> Unlawful entry and unlawful reentry into the country are federal   
   >> offenses. §§1325, 1326.   
   >   
   >Here is where you're working overtime to outstupid yourself. If an alien   
   crosses   
   >the U.S.—Mexico border unlawfully, makes his way to New York and avoids   
   >detection and apprehension for 10 years, he *cannot* be prosecuted for   
   unlawful   
   >entry.   
      
   No, He most cettainly can be prosecuted for unlawful   
   >entry.   
      
   In prosecuting someone for any crime, the government has to say where   
   and   
   >approximately when the crime occurred.   
      
   Nonsense...   
      
   But they have no idea when or where the   
   >alien entered unlawfully. For all the feds know, the alien managed to get from   
   >Mexico to Canada, then walked across from there. There is a reason virtually   
   no   
   >one is prosecuted for improper entry, *even if* caught in the act.   
   >   
   >No time and place ==> no prosecutable crime. You lose.   
      
    The civil penalty for being in this country unlawfully is   
   deportation, or removal, which the U.S. Supreme Court has held is not   
   “criminal punishment.”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)