XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun
XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns
From: invalid@none.com
In article ,
wsjames123n@gmail.com says...
>
> On 11/5/2025 8:44 AM, Attila wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:28:41 -0800, Salty Stan
> > in alt.atheism with message-id
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/5/2025 2:38 AM, Attila wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 15:09:19 -0800, Salty Stan
> >>> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 11/4/2025 2:13 PM, Attila wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 06:49:43 -0800, Salty Stan
> >>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 11/3/2025 5:19 AM, Attila wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 23:09:52 -0800, Salty Stan
> >>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>>>>> <5zYNQ.237243$0vja.216464@fx35.iad> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 10/26/2025 8:14 AM, Attila wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:41:08 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Attila wrote in
> >>>>>>>>>> news:074rfklkg5lortcr4sg22vkusg9e4g3i67@4ax.com:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 02:22:38 +0000, Mitchell Holman
> >>>>>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> nickname unavailable <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_ta
en"@gmail.com> wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in news:1taLQ.348609$RrE7.292641@fx45.iad:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2025 11:42 AM, No_Leftists_Here wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:10:38 -0700, nickname unavailable
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <"because_\\shitbag\\_was_taken"@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regardless of "how" the country is selected, do you think
it's
> >>>>>>>>>> right
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to deport someone to a country to which they have no
connection?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The illegals
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No such thing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can deport themselves to anywhere they want.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you pretend to be concerned โค? actually, obsessed โค?
with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unlawful presence?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Answer: you're not. That's just the fig leaf or smokescreen
for your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> racism. You don't really care about immigration status per se.
What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you care about is their race/ethnicity. If there were 10
million
> >>>>>>>>>> white
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> northern Europeans โค? Finns, Swedes, Norwegians, Danes,
Irish, Dutch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> โค? unlawfully present in the country, you wouldn't say a
thing. We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> know this about you. The issue for you and your fellow Nazi
"Attila"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is race and ethnicity โค? nothing else.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The irony is that America has ALWAYS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> depended on foreign immigrant labor. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>> indentured workers from England, the Irish,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the Germans, Chinses coolies, African slaves,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mexicans.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even now farmers have to fly in workers
> >>>>>>>>>>> >from JAMAICA because no one else will do the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> job.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> As long as they are here legally there is no problem.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How much extra do you want to pay
> >>>>>>>>>> for produce becuase expensive Jamaicans
> >>>>>>>>>> are being used instead of cheap migrants?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It has been suggested a program be set up to legally allow
> >>>>>>>>> farm workers in during the season. Congress has yet to pass
> >>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You stupid fuck. There *is* such a program already. It's called
H-2A visas. Look
> >>>>>>>> it up, you stupid lying ignorant fuck.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ok Then there is no reason to say farmers need illegals to
> >>>>>>> harvest crops.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is no such thing as "illegals" ? no such noun. Only racists use
that fake
> >>>>>> word.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Only idiots pretend it isn't a valid term.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, only smart people recognize it isn't a valid term. It's wrong
grammatically
> >>>> and it's wrong politically and legally. A person cannot illegal.
> >>>
> >>> Federal law states there are illegal aliens.
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't. But even if it did, that would be an atrociously written
law. It
> >> doesn't validate the use of the term.
> >>
> >> You only call them that because you're a hateful racist.
> >
> > 8 U.S. Code ง 1325 - Improper entry by alien
>
> Improper entry is a crime (a victimless crime ? about as serious as
jaywalking).
> Unlawful presence is *not* a crime. How many times do I have to instruct you
on
> this distinction?
>
> The use of "illegal" or "illegals" as a noun, or as an adjective modifying a
> person, is something only a racist fascist would do. They are undocumented
> immigrants.
He slapped you with facts.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
