XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Jerry Buchanan wrote:   
   > On 11/21/2025 9:46 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >> Jerry Buchanan wrote:   
   >>> On 11/21/2025 8:46 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>> Jerry Buchanan wrote:   
   >>>>> On 11/21/2025 8:31 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>> Clave wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "Agree to disagree" is reserved for things like "Pink   
   >>>>>>> Floyd is better than Led Zeppelin." *Not* racism,   
   >>>>>>> homophobia, sexism. *Not* basic human decency. *Not* human   
   >>>>>>> rights.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> *Not* the right to be treated equally regardless of race,   
   >>>>>>> religion, color, creed or sexual orientation.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> We do not have a difference of opinion on those. We have a   
   >>>>>>> difference in morality. Those who do not oppose the "isms"   
   >>>>>>> and who do not support basic human decency and human   
   >>>>>>> rights have no morality.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> morality is a spectrum.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, you stupid shit-4-braincell, it is not. Morality is   
   >>>>> binary. Something is moral within a society or it isn't.   
   >>>>> There are no "degrees" of morality.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> so for the trolley problem, which is the moral choice?   
   >>>   
   >>> Moral philosophers can't agree on which is the moral choice,   
   >>> but they do agree that if there is one, that one is fully   
   >>> moral, not moral "to some degree."   
   >>>   
   >>> You're an idiot.   
   >>   
   >> oohhhh and how would one find out if there is one?   
   >   
   > It doesn't matter "how" — if there is one, that is the moral   
   > choice/option and the other is immoral.   
   >   
   > You're still an idiot.   
      
   so you dont know if there is a moral choice, does that mean more   
   research is required?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)