Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.society.liberalism    |    An unfortunate mental disorder    |    6,487 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,795 of 6,487    |
|    jojo to Jerry Buchanan    |
|    Re: There are degrees of goodness/badnes    |
|    21 Nov 25 20:23:37    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns       From: f00@0f0.00f              Jerry Buchanan wrote:       > On 11/21/2025 12:07 PM, jojo wrote:       >> Jerry Buchanan wrote:       >>> On 11/21/2025 11:19 AM, jojo wrote:       >>>> Jerry Buchanan wrote:       >>>>> On 11/21/2025 10:57 AM, jojo wrote:       >>>>>> Clave wrote:       >>>>>>> If a storm breaks off a tree limb, and the limb hits the       >>>>>>> corner of your roof and takes off some of the eave and       >>>>>>> gutter, that's bad. If the limb crashes entirely through       >>>>>>> your roof and lands in the living room, that's worse.       >>>>>>> Goodness and badness – as practical consequences, not       >>>>>>> morality — occur along a spectrum. If you get an estimate       >>>>>>> for an automotive repair of $500, and it only ends up       >>>>>>> costing you $400, that's good. If it only ends up costing       >>>>>>> you $200, that's better, i.e. "more good."       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Morality is not like that. If you steal one tool (rake,       >>>>>>> shovel) from the side of your neighbor's house, that's       >>>>>>> wrong. If you steal all the tools, that's wrong, and it is       >>>>>>> not "more wrong" than stealing only one. Stealing all of       >>>>>>> them is a worse *practical* outcome for the neighbor, but       >>>>>>> either action is just wrong.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> so you're saying mortality is independent of goodness or       >>>>>> badness?       >>>>>       >>>>> I'm not saying anything about mortality, idiot.       >>>>>       >>>>> You attempted to equivocate on goodness/badness. I stopped you.       >>>>       >>>> so it is dependent on goodness and badness?       >>>       >>> You're attempting to equivocate again. It won't work again.       >>       >> i see, too bad.. or good??       >       > You don't see that your equivocation game collapsed.              so was that a good thing or a bad thing?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca