Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.society.liberalism    |    An unfortunate mental disorder    |    6,487 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,796 of 6,487    |
|    Jerry Buchanan to jojo    |
|    Re: There are degrees of goodness/badnes    |
|    21 Nov 25 12:40:48    |
      XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.fun       XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns       From: notgenx32@yahoo.com              On 11/21/2025 12:23 PM, jojo wrote:       > Jerry Buchanan wrote:       >> On 11/21/2025 12:07 PM, jojo wrote:       >>> Jerry Buchanan wrote:       >>>> On 11/21/2025 11:19 AM, jojo wrote:       >>>>> Jerry Buchanan wrote:       >>>>>> On 11/21/2025 10:57 AM, jojo wrote:       >>>>>>> Clave wrote:       >>>>>>>> If a storm breaks off a tree limb, and the limb hits the corner of       your       >>>>>>>> roof and takes off some of the eave and gutter, that's bad. If the       limb       >>>>>>>> crashes entirely through your roof and lands in the living room,       that's       >>>>>>>> worse. Goodness and badness – as practical consequences, not       morality —       >>>>>>>> occur along a spectrum. If you get an estimate for an automotive       repair       >>>>>>>> of $500, and it only ends up costing you $400, that's good. If it only       >>>>>>>> ends up costing you $200, that's better, i.e. "more good."       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Morality is not like that. If you steal one tool (rake, shovel) from       the       >>>>>>>> side of your neighbor's house, that's wrong. If you steal all the       tools,       >>>>>>>> that's wrong, and it is not "more wrong" than stealing only one.       >>>>>>>> Stealing all of them is a worse *practical* outcome for the neighbor,       >>>>>>>> but either action is just wrong.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> so you're saying mortality is independent of goodness or badness?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I'm not saying anything about mortality, idiot.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> You attempted to equivocate on goodness/badness. I stopped you.       >>>>>       >>>>> so it is dependent on goodness and badness?       >>>>       >>>> You're attempting to equivocate again. It won't work again.       >>>       >>> i see, too bad.. or good??       >>       >> You don't see that your equivocation game collapsed.       >       > so was that a good thing or a bad thing?              It's a very good (high quality) thing.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca