Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.society.liberalism    |    An unfortunate mental disorder    |    6,487 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,003 of 6,487    |
|    Pelosi Goes To prison to All    |
|    Trump: Military courts may investigate s    |
|    23 Nov 25 04:00:47    |
      XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.military, sac.politics       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns       From: noreply@mixmin.net              President Trump suggested in an interview aired Friday that the       Department of Defense is investigating the six Democratic Congressional       veterans who released a video this week urging service members to reject       unlawful orders.              Why it matters: The threat of an investigation into the message is       highly unusual and escalates the president's trend of policing       Americans' protected free speech when it's critical of him or his       allies.              In the video, the veterans — Sens. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) and Mark       Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Reps. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Maggie Goodlander       (D-N.H.), Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) — told the       military and intelligence communities that "no one has to carry out       orders that violate the law or our Constitution."              Trump reacted to the video on Truth Social Thursday, including in a post       where he wrote: "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH," prompting a       firestorm response from Democratic leaders in Congress and a long-shot       U.S. Capitol Police probe over the messages.              What they're saying: Trump said during Friday's appearance on "The Brian       Kilmeade Show" that the six lawmakers were in "serious trouble. I'm not       threatening death, but I think they're in serious trouble. In the old       days, it was death."              "I think [Secretary of Defense] Pete Hegseth is looking into it," he       said, and later added: "I know they're looking into it militarily. I       don't know for a fact, but I think the military is looking into it, the       military courts."              The Pentagon referred Axios to the White House for comment, which       referred Axios to the president's comments.              Worthy of your time: Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche laid out the       case for why the lawmakers could be investigated on Fox News Thursday,       but declined to answer directly if the Justice Department is actively       investigating, as is protocol.              The department told Axios they have "no comment" beyond Blanche's       remarks. Yes, but: Members of the military "have the right, and in some       cases have the duty, to refuse illegal orders," according to the       National Lawyers Guild Military Law Task Force.              Zoom in: Members of the armed forces are subject to both civilian laws       and courts as well as the military justice system.              Active duty members are always subject to the Uniform Code of Military       Justice. But how the UCMJ applies to veterans is complicated and depends       on how they retired from active service.              Out of the six lawmakers, only Sen. Slotkin's office responded to Axios'       request for comment. They referred us to Slotkin's Thursday evening post       on X.              https://www.axios.com/2025/11/21/trump-investigate-sedition-video-democra       ts-congress-veterans              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca