XPost: alt.conspiracy, talk.politics.guns, or.politics
XPost: alt.atheism, alt.politics.trump
From: kw19@kw.kw
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:46:28 -0600, Loran wrote:
>KWills wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:12:26 -0600, Loran wrote:
>>
>>> Lucas McCain wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2024 9:36 AM, Loran wrote:
>>>>> Lucas McCain wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/4/2024 9:51 AM, Loran wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Withe regard to Georgia Guide Stones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent commandment.
>>>>>>
>>>>> How about the 500 million cull, you down with that level of person
>>>>> shrinkage/genocide?
>>>>
>>>> From my own observations while traveling in foreign lands, I'd say 500
>>>> million is still too many humans if the planet is to be given a chance
>>>> to support all life in the long term.
>>>
>>> You'd be both:
>>>
>>> 1. wrong
>>
>> Possible.
>>
>>> 2. in deficit of critical proofs and citations
>>
>> How would Lucas offer proof and citations for a personal
>> observation?
>
>With supportive citations from said places, duh.
>
So these places can confirm an observation?
>And then expansion of the micro cases into the macro, duh.
>
Ibid.
>
>>>
>>>> I would not personally involve
>>>> myself with some cull on moral grounds, but I do believe that there are
>>>> far too many humans for the planet to support long term without
>>>> degrading the planet to the point that the living would envy the dead.
>>>
>>> Water is the defining measure, and we're about to get a lot more of that
>>> soon!
>>
>> How? Are you expecting an ice comet to land on earth?
>
>That has happened before and will again.
>
>Rev. 8: 10-12
>
>
>“The third angel sounded his trumpet, and a great star, blazing like a
>torch, fell from the sky on a third of the rivers and on the springs of
>water—the name of the star is Wormwood. A third of the waters turned
>bitter, and many people died from the waters that had become bitter.”
>
That you believe the Bible is all well and good. But nothing in
the passage you quote is about getting more water. It's about a third
of the water already present being poisonous.
>>>> In the 1970's there was a "back to the land" movement and a zero
>>>> population growth (ZPG) movement that got hijacked by Chamber of
>>>> Commerce types who felt otherwise and seemed to have been able to buy
>>>> off politicians to push for unsustainable growth.
>>>
>>> ZPG and Paul Eehrlich were propagandists whose predictions all failed.
>>
>> ZPG isn't a prediction.
>>
>>> Let's face facts here, the Georgia Guidestones contained the recipe for
>>> genocide that Covid started and the Dems are planning to finish.
>>
>> Unlikely. Most accept that it was to be a means of running the
>> world after a nuclear war.
>
>No, there is no "most", that's a fictional appeal to a consensus
>definition of the guidestones' purpose and authorship where none exists.
Poor word choice on my part. Perhaps 'many' is a better word to
use. If you want to get real picky, 'some' can be used.
No one, except those who designed them, can KNOW what was
intended. We can come to a conclusion based on the evidence available.
And a means to help ensure the world continues is a reasonable
conclusion.
They were made during the 'cold war.' Nuclear war was possible.
Had it happened, the population of the earth would be decreased. Not
just from the initial explosions, but from the fallout and continued
radioactivity.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
