XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: or.politics, alt.atheism   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   Frank <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in news:v3vaqf$24j9t$1@dont-email.me:   
      
   > On 6/7/2024 11:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:   
   >> In article ,   
   >> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...   
   >>>   
   >>> Skeeter  wrote in news:66630c28$0$7053   
   >>> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article , invalide@invalid.invalid   
   >>>> says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Skeeter wrote:   
   >>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> 2020 vot totals   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Biden - 81,284,666 (51.3%)   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Trump - 74,224,319 (46.9%)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> He made Biden look like a retard.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So, since #FelonDon lost, that's makes him   
   >>>>> worse than a retard!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What an idiot. Keep drinking the CNN koolaid.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Speaking of retards ,,,   
   >>> ===========   
   >>>   
   >>> Trump's 'intellectual capacity' questioned after comparison to   
   >>> interview with Biden   
   >>>   
   >>> Both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump conducted   
   >>> lengthy interviews with Time Magazine this year, but journalist   
   >>> Magdi Jacobs contends that the magazine's interviewers seem to have   
   >>> dumbed down their questions when interviewing Trump. Writing on   
   >>> Twitter, Jacobs does a side-by-side comparison between the Trump and   
   >>> Biden interviews and flags significant differences in the way that   
   >>> interviewers question the two main presidential contenders.   
   >>>   
   >>> "Something striking: the substance of Trump and Biden's answers is,   
   >>> of course, quite distinct but, even more than that, one can tell the   
   >>> interviewer has more confidence in the intellectual capacity of one   
   >>> man over the other," she wrote. They then pointed out to an instance   
   >>> in which the interviewer asked both men about their positions on   
   >>> defending Taiwan. "I want to get your thoughts on China," Time asked   
   >>> Trump. "Do you think the U.S. should defend Taiwan if China   
   >>> invades?"   
   >>>   
   >>> When it came time to ask Biden the same question, however, the   
   >>> interviewer asked a much more detailed question. "CIA Director Bill   
   >>> Burns says the President Xi Jinping of China has ordered the Chinese   
   >>> military to be ready by 2027 to conduct a successful invasion of   
   >>> Taiwan," Time asked Biden. "You said on multiple occasions that you   
   >>> would use U.S. forces to defend Taiwan. What does that mean? Is it   
   >>> boots on the ground? What shape would that take?"   
   >>>   
   >>> In analyzing this, Jacobs said that it indicated that Time   
   >>> interviewers believed they needed to dumb down questions to get a   
   >>> cogent response from Trump. "The interviewer(s) at Time seem to   
   >>> believe one man (Biden) is capable of answering a complex question   
   >>> containing multiple premises," she wrote. "The interviewer(s) at   
   >>> Time seem to not believe the other man (Trump) is capable of   
   >>> answering a simple unlayered question."   
   >>>   
   >>> https://www.rawstory.com/trump-biden-2024-2668477005/   
   >>   
   >> Is all that supposed to mean something? You all said the laptop   
   >> didn't exist too.   
   >   
   > Total load of crap about Biden.  If it were not for compliant liberal   
   > media he would not be president.   
   >   
   "compliant liberal media"?!  Like NY Times that will only run negative   
   stories about Biden?  That "compliant liberal media"??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)