XPost: talk.politics.guns, talk.environment, alt.home.repair   
   From: esp@snet.n   
      
   On 6/9/2024 7:19 PM, P. Coonan wrote:   
   > On 09 Jun 2024, Ed P  posted some   
   > news:v44p74$3lsct$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On 6/9/2024 10:54 AM, Skid Marks wrote:   
   >>> Ed P wrote:   
   >>>> On 6/9/2024 12:20 AM, manure sales wrote:   
   >>>>> On 6/8/2024 1:24 PM, Bob F wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 6/8/2024 1:15 AM, Rudy Hartung wrote:   
   >>>>>>> That's all it is.  Using government grants to force acceptance   
   >>>>>>> of left-wing stupidity that has no foundation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You are clearly too stupid to comprehend the science. Too bad you   
   >>>>>> like to broadcast that to the world.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Specifically what science?  The Farmers Almanac is more accurate   
   >>>>> than the highly questionable model data being used to formulate   
   >>>>> policy based on fear and speculation.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> The science is clear.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Hogwash.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The climate alarmists have no "science" proving mankind is the   
   >>>>> cause of any such thing.  Accurate temperature measurement itself   
   >>>>> wasn't even a valid metric until 300 years ago.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Try again.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I live near Tampa Bay in Florida.  In the 1970s, this area had 60   
   >>>> days of 90 degree or above temperatures.  In the 2010s, we get 120   
   >>>> days of 90 degrees or more.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Why is that?  Will be 95 today.   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe it's caused by the money-grubbin' globalist elite Democrats   
   >>> flying around in their gas-guzzlin' Gulfstreams?   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you think the Democrat's war on internal combustion engines will   
   >>> ever morph into a war on gas-guzzlin' private jets?   
   >>   
   >> They should.  Give it a few years as oil becomes more scare and very   
   >> high priced.  Oil is a finite material.   
   >   
   > Coal was an enabler for human development in terms of transportation,   
   > heat, manufacturing, new energy sources etc.  It's no longer a primary   
   > source, but it has been confirmed to be used by cave men and the Romans.   
   > Use has been declining for cleaner solutions.   
   >   
   > Petroleum took coal's place among other energy solutions.  None are   
   > perfect and have waste / recycling problems when exhausted.   
   >   
   > Solar is good but has manufacturing, capacity and storage issues.  One   
   > major volcanic episode or astroid strike could impact solar power for   
   > years.   
   >   
   > There is no one size fits all solution for obvious reasons.   
      
   True, but that does no mean we should do nothing.   
      
   Just watched 60 Minutes tonight.  Wyoming, the largest coal supplier, it   
   putting up the largest wind farm.   
      
   Technology is advancing and we should be using it to reduce pollution   
   and secure our future.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)