XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, rec.arts.tv, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: or.politics, alt.atheism   
   From: skeeterweed@photonmail.com   
      
   In article , bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
   says...   
   >   
   > Skeeter  wrote in news:666700fe$0$3102250   
   > $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   >   
   > > In article , bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
   > > says...   
   > >>   
   > >> Skeeter  wrote in   
   > >> news:666611a4$0$3747334$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   > >>   
   > >> > In article , bax02   
   > _spamblock@baxcode.com   
   > >> > says...   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Skeeter  wrote in news:66651ff2$3   
   > $1943532   
   > >> >> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> > In article ,   
   > >> >> > bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> Skeeter  wrote in   
   > >> >> >> news:66648c1e$3$2363134$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   > >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> > In article , bax02   
   > >> >> _spamblock@baxcode.com   
   > >> >> >> > says...   
   > >> >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> Skeeter  wrote in news:6663d854$0   
   > >> >> $1412894   
   > >> >> >> >> $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   > >> >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> > In article ,   
   > >> >> >> >> > bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...   
   > >> >> >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> Frank <"frank "@frank.net> wrote in   
   > >> >> >> >> >> news:v3vaqf$24j9t$1@dont-email.me:   
   > >> >> >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> > On 6/7/2024 11:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> In article ,   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com says...   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Skeeter  wrote in   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> news:66630c28$0$7053 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> In article ,   
   > >> >> >> >> invalide@invalid.invalid   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> says...   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Skeeter wrote:   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> In article ,   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> noemail@aol.com says...   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> 2020 vot totals   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Biden - 81,284,666 (51.3%)   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Trump - 74,224,319 (46.9%)   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> He made Biden look like a retard.   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> So, since #FelonDon lost, that's makes him   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> worse than a retard!   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>> What an idiot. Keep drinking the CNN koolaid.   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Speaking of retards ,,,   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> ===========   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Trump's 'intellectual capacity' questioned after   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> comparison   
   > >> >> to   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> interview with Biden   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Both President Joe Biden and former President Donald   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Trump   
   > >> >> >> >> conducted   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> lengthy interviews with Time Magazine this year, but   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> journalist Magdi Jacobs contends that the magazine's   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> interviewers seem to   
   > >> >> >> >> have   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> dumbed down their questions when interviewing Trump.   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Writing on Twitter, Jacobs does a side-by-side   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> comparison between   
   > >> >> the   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Trump   
   > >> >> >> >> and   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Biden interviews and flags significant differences in   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> the   
   > >> >> way   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> that interviewers question the two main presidential   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> contenders.   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> "Something striking: the substance of Trump and   
   > Biden's   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> answers   
   > >> >> >> >> is,   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> of course, quite distinct but, even more than that,   
   > one   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> can tell   
   > >> >> >> >> the   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> interviewer has more confidence in the intellectual   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> capacity of   
   > >> >> >> >> one   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> man over the other," she wrote. They then pointed out   
   > to   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> an   
   > >> >> >> >> instance   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> in which the interviewer asked both men about their   
   > >> >> positions   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> on defending Taiwan. "I want to get your thoughts on   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> China," Time   
   > >> >> >> >> asked   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Trump. "Do you think the U.S. should defend Taiwan if   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> China invades?"   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> When it came time to ask Biden the same question,   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> however,   
   > >> >> the   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> interviewer asked a much more detailed question. "CIA   
   > >> >> Director   
   > >> >> >> >> Bill   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Burns says the President Xi Jinping of China has   
   > ordered   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> the   
   > >> >> >> >> Chinese   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> military to be ready by 2027 to conduct a successful   
   > >> >> invasion   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> of Taiwan," Time asked Biden. "You said on multiple   
   > >> >> occasions   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> that   
   > >> >> >> >> you   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> would use U.S. forces to defend Taiwan. What does that   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> mean? Is it boots on the ground? What shape would that   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> take?"   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> In analyzing this, Jacobs said that it indicated that   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> Time interviewers believed they needed to dumb down   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> questions to get a cogent response from Trump. "The   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> interviewer(s) at   
   > >> >> Time   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> seem to believe one man (Biden) is capable of   
   > answering   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> a complex question containing multiple premises," she   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote. "The interviewer(s) at Time seem to not believe   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> the other   
   > >> >> man   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> (Trump) is capable of answering a simple unlayered   
   > >> >> question."   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>> https://www.rawstory.com/trump-biden-2024-2668477005/   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >>   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> Is all that supposed to mean something? You all said   
   > the   
   > >> >> laptop   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >> didn't exist too.   
   > >> >> >> >> >> >   
   > >> >> >> >> >> > Total load of crap about Biden.  If it were not for   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)