XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa   
   From: "@frank.net   
      
   On 8/6/2024 10:39 AM, John Doe wrote:   
   > On 8/6/2024 1:08 AM, rbowman wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 01:24:48 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>     But what is the manpower - thus $$$ - involved ???   
   >>>   
   >>>     Does not sound like a 'solution' that can be sustained or   
   >>>     broad-scale.   
   >>   
   >> No, it wouldn't be viable given the millions of acres of forests. In some   
   >> cases it can be combined with commercial thinning but the problem is   
   >> having enough merchantable timber to sweeten the deal when the FS puts   
   >> the   
   >> sale up.   
   >>   
   >> It's also a two step process since they have to return to burn the slash   
   >> piles when conditions are suitable.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> fwiw, wildland fire fighters do use rakes   
   >   
   >   
   > True. The rakes are another manifestation of people who feel it   
   > necessary to try to justify Trump's strange ideas about raking forests,   
   > using nukes against hurricanes, and altering hurricane trajectories with   
   > a sharpie.   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLeod_(tool)   
   >>   
   >> Direline explosives are more fun though.   
   >   
      
   What is strange are people believing the pap the liberal media feeds them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)