XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.conspiracy   
   From: no-spam-thank-you@not.home   
      
   In article ,   
   D. Ray   wrote:   
      
   > So you're saying   
      
   I'm saying what everybody is saying: that the target of the attack   
   was Hezbollah, and that the vast majority of those killed/injured   
   were Hezbollah terrorists.   
      
   "Innocent bystanders"? I don't know. But from the videos posted,   
   the force of the explosions is rather small, and people standing   
   rather close to them are not affected.   
      
   Perhaps the Hezbollah should not have started a war against Israel,   
   and fire thousands of rockets at Israeli civilians? Perhaps it should   
   not operate from within civilian areas?   
      
   Perhaps Hezbollah should not hold Lebanon hostage, dragging it into war   
   after war it does not want, while its fat pig of a leader is happily   
   hiding in a bunker?   
      
   "With the ongoing fighting along the Israel-Lebanon border, criticism of   
   Hezbollah continues in   
   Lebanon, including the claim that the organization dragged Lebanon into an   
   unnecessary war which   
   does not serve the country's national interests and exacerbates Lebanon's   
   already problematic   
   internal situation. According to the claims, Hezbollah serves the interests of   
   Iran, not Lebanon,   
   Hezbollah is not "the protector of Lebanon," as it represents itself, but is   
   dragging the country   
   into the abyss of a severe economic-political crisis. Some of the   
   organization's critics state that   
   the only way to resolve the situation is by implementing UN Security Council   
   Resolution 1701, which   
   calls for the removal of Hezbollah from south Lebanon and replacing it with   
   Lebanese army forces."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)