Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.survival    |    Discussing survivalism for end-times    |    131,166 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 129,907 of 131,166    |
|    186283@ud0s4.net to Paul Aubrin    |
|    Re: Massive Fires in Columbia & Much of     |
|    23 Sep 24 22:30:25    |
      XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.politics       XPost: alt.politics.usa       From: 186282@ud0s4.net              On 9/23/24 11:46 AM, Paul Aubrin wrote:       > Le 23/09/2024 à 00:37, 186282@ud0s4.net a écrit :       >>       >> Colombian authorities said Sunday they were fighting forest       >> fires across seven departments, as a scorching drought fanned       >> blazes across Latin America.       >       > 1.2 °C more has hardly any importance when the ignition temperature of       > wood is 270 °C.               I'm gonna take issue with that because the DEATH TEMPERATURE        for most forms of life, including ours, is MUCH lower. On the        flip I don't find a 1.2c 'average' all THAT alarming and many        factors - physical and statistical - can tick temperatures        up and down over years/centuries/millennia.               Really long term stats, the Earth is just *freezin* right        now. The dinos and predecessors (and our itty bitty fuzzy        shrew-like progenitors too) lived in a MUCH warmer world        for hundreds of millions of years. On the flip there were        also a number of "snowball earth" incidents about 1b years        ago. "Normal" is a piss-poor term when trying to describe        global climate.              > On the opposite side, fuel accumulation and arsonists have a great       > importance. Example :       >       > https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7914203/Nowa-Nowa-pro       esters-blocked-burning-East-Gippsland-bushfire.html       >       >       > How a tiny group of Greenie protesters managed to stop backburning in       > East Gippsland over worries baby birds would die - before fires ravaged       > the area killing four people and forcing mass evacuations from the beach       >       > Protesters in Nowa Nowa, in East Gippsland interrupted hazard       > reduction burns       > Complaints about deaths of baby birds saw 370ha planned burn       > reduced to 9ha       > Firefighters credit backburning in NSW for saving towns from       > horrific bushfires       > 29 people and 1 billion animals were killed, and 10 million ha       > burnt in mega fires       > Do you know others areas where backburning wasn't carried out?       > Email: Joshua.Hanrahan@mailonline.com                      It's EASY to spot where back-burning and brush-clearing efforts        have been thwarted - just get the latest hi-rez thermal images        and look for the BIG FIRES :-)               Woodlands are mostly MEANT to burn about every five years lest        gigatons of debris build up and KILL EVERYTHING when they do        finally light up. "Smokey" is an ECO-CRIMINAL (probably in        the employ of the timber industry).              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca