XPost: alt.wildland.firefighting, talk.politics.guns, alt.los-angeles   
   XPost: sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: 0897463@compuserve.com   
      
   On 1/24/2025 10:32 AM, Michael A Terrell wrote:   
   > On 1/24/2025 8:44 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,   
   > convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another   
   > content-free batch of lies:   
   >   
   >> In article , nuh-uh@nope.com says...   
   >>>   
   >>> On 2025-01-23 17:31, pothead wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-01-24, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-01-23 16:10, pothead wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2025-01-23, Alan  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2025-01-23 15:03, AlleyCat wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:58:34 -0800,  Alan says...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Or your own "innocent" family like Joe did.   
   >>>>>>>>> Do you have any actual evidence of any wrongdoing   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No "wrongdoing"?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Then, why were they pardoned.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If they did nothing wrong, Trump CAN'T put them in jail or even   
   >>>>>>>> charge them with anything.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So, why DID feeble Joe pardon his family and others who were   
   >>>>>>>> never charged with anything?   
   >>>>>>> Cart before the horse.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Do YOU have any actual EVIDENCE that any Biden family member is   
   >>>>>>> guilty   
   >>>>>>> of anything beyond an income tax issue for Hunter Biden.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Read it for a change.   
   >>>>> I asked you before to produce the strongest piece of evidence you   
   >>>>> think   
   >>>>> it contains...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ...and you punked.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Just because you refuse to accept the facts posted in my link means   
   >>>> nothing.   
   >>>> If it walks like a duck etc....   
   >>>   
   >>> Nope.   
   >>>   
   >>> The difference is that the only way /I/ could satisfy you is to read the   
   >>> entire thing and refute every piece of it.   
   >>>   
   >>> YOU, on the other hand, get to pick whichever item is most damning...   
   >>>   
   >>> ...but you won't.   
   >>>   
   >>> And now you pivot:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And BTW it's far more incriminating evidence than some wackadoodle kook   
   >>>> accusing Trump of rape.   
   >>>> She can't remember dates.   
   >>>> Lied about the dress she was wearing.   
   >>>> Can't remember specifics.   
   >>>> Accused another man of rape.   
   >>>> etc.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>   
   >> So why did Joe pardon all those people?   
   >   
   > Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit   
   Preemptive excuses are not answers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)