XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.trump   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:01:32 -0600, Rodney Luther King   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 10/15/2025 2:04 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:50:17 -0600, Rodney Luther King   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 10/14/2025 2:09 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >>>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 20:10:31 -0600, Rodney Luther King   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 10/13/2025 5:48 PM, Governor Swill wrote:   
   >>>>>> Rodney and c186282 are both conspiracy theorists.  When the (sic) lack   
   the   
   >>>>>> information necessary to make a decision or work something out   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Then we decide that it would be a good topic for discussion in certain   
   >>>>> usenet discussion groups.  Often, instead of serving as a catalyst for a   
   >>>>> stimulating and elucidating discussion, we are attacked by persons like   
   >>>>> "Governor Swill" for having the audacity to suggest possible root causes   
   >>>>> of events like the Tennessee explosion, or the Palestine, Ohio railroad   
   >>>>> disaster where a railroad tank car full of vinyl chloride was set on   
   >>>>> fire by incompetent emergency responders, or when an oil refinery   
   >>>>> exploded recently in Los Angeles, or when a ship lost power and collided   
   >>>>> the Francis Scott Key bridge near Baltimore.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        None of which have been found to be the result of sabotage. But,   
   >>>> of course, that's what *THEY* want everyone to think, right?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "Governor Swill" stamps his feet and flails around because "Rodney   
   >>>>> Luther King" and "c186282" dare to think outside the narrow bounds of   
   >>>>> the mainstream media and question whether what caused the explosion in   
   >>>>> Tennessee might NOT be an "industrial accident" and might have been   
   >>>>> sabotage or perhaps a drone attack from someone outside of the   
   >>>>> explosives facility.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>        Present your best evidence that, at the very least, shows your   
   >>>> claim is in any way plausible. As of the time I write this, everything   
   >>>> I've seen and heard suggests it was an industrial accident.   
   >>>   
   >>> Please break down what the "everything" is that "suggests" there is no   
   >>> need for the BATF to investigate the explosion as possibly more than an   
   >>> industrial "accident."  You seem to be on a mission to make any American   
   >>> who thinks the topic is worth discussing and speculating on is a kook   
   >>> and a nut job.   
   >>   
   >>       Your avoidance is a STRONG indication that you have NOTHING to   
   >> offer in support of your conspiracy delusion.   
   >   
   >And you have nothing to support your claim that you know with absolute   
   >certainty what caused the deadly explosion at the explosives factory in   
   >Tennessee.   
      
        It is most fortunate I've not even suggested I know with absolute   
   certainty. As seen above, my position is, "...everything I've seen and   
   heard suggests it was an industrial accident."   
        Do you think misrepresenting my position benefits you? Are you   
   really so DESPERATE to avoid reality you HAD to lie about what I've   
   posted?   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)