XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: df@tutanato.com   
      
   On 11/11/2025 9:06 PM, c186282 wrote:   
   > On 11/11/25 22:50, Doctor Fill wrote:   
   >> On 11/11/2025 8:09 PM, c186282 wrote:   
   >>> On 11/11/25 20:36, Doctor Fill wrote:   
   >>>> On 11/10/2025 7:59 PM, c186282 wrote:   
   >>>>> https://techxplore.com/news/2025-11-popular-ai-ready-safely-power.html   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Popular AI models aren't ready to safely power robots, study warns   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Robots powered by popular artificial intelligence models are   
   >>>>> currently unsafe for general purpose real-world use, according   
   >>>>> to new research from King's College London and Carnegie   
   >>>>> Mellon University.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> . . .   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>    They easily lie, cheat, confabulate. They are very   
   >>>>>    biased when it comes to social status, race, religion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Bias is not necessarily "unsafe" or a defect of some sort.   
   >>>   
   >>>    IS if you're on the downside of that bias ....   
   >>>   
   >>>    AIs will soon be used to decide if you're worthy   
   >>>    for most everything. Human bosses love that, just   
   >>>    blame the machine when there's a big fuck-up.   
   >>>   
   >>>> A "consumer" might be "biased" toward buying cars known for quality   
   >>>> and reliability over cars known for electrical problems and frequent   
   >>>> recalls.  One might be biased not to go into dangerous parts of   
   >>>> cities and, perhaps, note that a particular ethnic group or race is   
   >>>> associated with crime and violence.  It would be rather foolish to   
   >>>> say all biases are wrong headed, even if it's a robot that holds the   
   >>>> biases.   
   >>>   
   >>>    A "race" or whatever may have better or worse crime   
   >>>    stats or such, but an INDIVIDUAL of said groups is   
   >>>    not necessarily what the bias would imply. All should   
   >>>    get a fair shake in court, at the bank, at the job.   
   >>>   
   >>>    Sorry, but it sounds as if you're into 'mechano-racism'   
   >>>    here - NAZI aims 'justified' by machine 'intelligence'.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I fail to see the benefit of programming woketardedness into AI   
   >> controlled robots.  If the AI is crippled by wokeness and there are   
   >> virtual gatekeepers second guessing the AI decision, then one ends up   
   >> with silicon versions of usenet trolls.   
   >   
   >    "Gatekeepers" can be SUED ... biz would like to   
   >    keep it ALL 'AI' so they can blame the machine.   
   >    Smart legalistics.   
   >   
   >    In short, NO 'gatekeepers' - the word of the AI   
   >    will be the alpha and omega.   
   >   
   >    Whatever 'group'/demo you may fall into, the AI   
   >    will be ruthless - and SCREW you if it's algos   
   >    decide so Just Because.   
   >   
      
   The whole country or planet will be one big Gaza controlled by Palentir   
   like AI killing bots.   
      
   --   
   "Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to   
   aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic   
   transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring   
   unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to   
   enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and   
   abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits   
   bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States   
   in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection   
   1324(a)(3)."   
      
   "Who could have predicted just a decade ago that Germany would have a   
   world championship winning basketball team, but be closing down its   
   breweries in record numbers? It’s a sobering reality indeed." -- Ron Unz   
      
   https://www.globalgulag.us   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)