Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.tv.buffy-v-slayer    |    Show about girl power, written by a dude    |    152,792 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 150,919 of 152,792    |
|    David to All    |
|    What Angel Did Better Than Buffy    |
|    07 Oct 14 18:08:59    |
      From: daviderl31@yahoo.com              http://www.hypable.com/2014/10/05/15-year-anniversary-what-angel       did-better-than-buffy/              Fifteen years later: what Angel Did Better Than Buffy              15 years ago today, on October 5 1999, the Buffy spinoff Angel premiered on       The WB. The first episode, “City Of…” saw Angel (David Boreanaz) leave       Sunnydale behind for L.A., where he was hoping to find redemption.              It quickly became clear that Angel would be a very different animal than       Buffy, and many fans of the original show didn’t bother with the spinoff. It       also developed its own unique fanbase, who had either never watched Buffy,       or had given the first show a try and decided that Angel was more to their       liking.              And for those who watched both, it was impossible not to have a favourite.       And loyal Buffy fans had to ask themselves the uncomfortable question: “Do I       prefer Buffy because it’s better, or because I watched it first?”              Because Angel was darker. It was more grown-up, and the stakes were higher.       Main characters died like flies, proving that “daring to kill characters”       isn’t a new phenomenon in television. Angel was way ahead of the curve.              Still, Buffy fans refused to admit the possibility that Angel might be the       better show, and Angel fans refused to see the value of Buffy, dismissing it       as the unpolished prototype.              Let’s face it: Angel was cooler than Buffy.              Buffy (Sarah Michelle Gellar) was a teenage girl cursed with supernatural       abilities and the responsibility of saving the world. Angel was a       200-something-year-old-vampire, cursed with a soul and an undying love for       the aforementioned teenage girl. In Angel we delved deeper into his       backstory, learning that the soul didn’t magically turn him into a hero.       That was a choice.              The Angel series also humanized the character in a way the Buffy series       never quite managed to do with its lead (despite her awkward slayer puns):       he got funny. Fans already loved Angel’s dark alter-ego Angelus, but when       Angel got his own show, his good self had to be infused with a large dose of       personality. Thus his broodiness became childish stubbornness, and he       developed a wonderfully inappropriate, dark sense of humour.              While Angel was probably more angsty than Buffy, he was very rarely allowed       to wallow for too long. When he sulked in the shadows, Cordelia (Charisma       Carpenter) was there to lighten up the situation with a well-timed pun. When       Buffy was sad, everyone had to be sad.              Still both characters were badass and versatile in their own right. Buffy       did a lot for female characters on television, and the fact that the writers       rarely compromised her character for cheap gags speaks to their credit. She       is a fantastically well-developed, flawed character whose biggest crime was       reacting realistically to the countless tragedies she had to endure. She       might have been depressed, but guys, she had plenty of reasons to be. And       yet she kept fighting, being the hero everyone needed her to be.              Ultimately Angel probably comes across as more likeable because he tended to       embrace and indulge his dark side, making him more of an antihero. Buffy was       purely good, and unfortunately that’s not always as “interesting.”              We tend to forget that a) killing characters for shock value is a soap opera       trope which was already overused in the 90s, and b) Angel was the first –       and arguably only – show that did it right.              Main character deaths do not automatically improve a show’s value. Believe       it or not, living in uncertainty about the fate of your beloved characters       doesn’t necessarily improve your viewing experience. When shows kill       characters and life goes on like normal after the fact, the death was cheap       and unnecessary.              Character deaths on Angel were never cheap and unnecessary. Over the course       of the series, the show killed a total of four main characters – that’s       half       its cast, by the way: Doyle (RIP Glenn Quinn), Cordelia, Fred (Amy Acker),       and Wesley (Alexis Denisof). Each character was loved, each character was       missed, and each character’s life and death mattered to the show as a whole.              Peripheral characters had worthy arcs and demises, too. Most notable was       Darla (Julie Benz), who staked herself giving birth to her and Angel’s son       Connor (the o.g. vampire baby, y’all). Lindsey (Christian Kane) and Lilah       (Stephanie Romanov) both had dramatic, worthy death scenes.              MORE at the link              http://daviderl.com/ .       http://daviderl31.blogspot.com/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca