XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: davidjohnston29@block.com   
      
   On 3/11/2017 7:24 PM, Your Name wrote:   
   > In article <58c467a5$0$798$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, Wouter Valentijn   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Op 10-3-2017 om 22:47 schreef Your Name:   
   >>> In article , Ubiquitous   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>> ...   
   >>>> 1) Sarah Michelle Gellar   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Sarah Michelle Gellar doesn’t get nearly enough credit for how   
   >>>> incredible an actress she is, and how integral she was to Buffy the   
   >>>> Vampire Slayer. No one, I repeat, no one else could’ve brought Buffy to   
   >>>> life as much as she did. Gellar handled the comedic and action-filled   
   >>>> scenes like a pro, but her real strength was in the show’s more   
   >>>> dramatic moments. Gellar’s performance was wrought with real, raw   
   >>>> emotion. Nobody ever recovers after watching her in “The Body.” Nobody.   
   >>> ...   
   >>>   
   >>> "incredible actress"?!? She's not even a "mildly good actress" ...   
   >>> she's a one-"hit" wonder who put me off bothering to even try to watch   
   >>> the Buffy show.   
   >>>   
   >>> Charmed was the much better show with much better actresses ... well,   
   >>> excluding the dismally bad Shannen Doherty of course, back thankfully   
   >>> she did her usual walk-out-in-a-sulk-for-not-being-THE-star-of-the-show   
   >>> routine.   
   >>   
   >> Charmed the much better show ?!?   
   >>   
   >> ROFL !!!!   
   >   
   > And which of the two shows reportedly has a silly "reboot" in the   
   > planning? Yep, "Charmed", not silly "Buffy".  :-p   
      
   That's not becaue Buffy's worse.  It's because the Charmed Ones are   
   easily replaced by another set of three.  You'd have to wait a lot   
   longer to before recasting the part of Buffy would fly.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)