XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article <58c467a5$0$798$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, Wouter Valentijn   
    wrote:   
      
   > Op 10-3-2017 om 22:47 schreef Your Name:   
   > > In article , Ubiquitous   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > > ...   
   > >> 1) Sarah Michelle Gellar   
   > >>   
   > >> Sarah Michelle Gellar doesn’t get nearly enough credit for how   
   > >> incredible an actress she is, and how integral she was to Buffy the   
   > >> Vampire Slayer. No one, I repeat, no one else could’ve brought Buffy to   
   > >> life as much as she did. Gellar handled the comedic and action-filled   
   > >> scenes like a pro, but her real strength was in the show’s more   
   > >> dramatic moments. Gellar’s performance was wrought with real, raw   
   > >> emotion. Nobody ever recovers after watching her in “The Body.” Nobody.   
   > > ...   
   > >   
   > > "incredible actress"?!? She's not even a "mildly good actress" ...   
   > > she's a one-"hit" wonder who put me off bothering to even try to watch   
   > > the Buffy show.   
   > >   
   > > Charmed was the much better show with much better actresses ... well,   
   > > excluding the dismally bad Shannen Doherty of course, back thankfully   
   > > she did her usual walk-out-in-a-sulk-for-not-being-THE-star-of-the-show   
   > > routine.   
   >   
   > Charmed the much better show ?!?   
   >   
   > ROFL !!!!   
      
   And which of the two shows reportedly has a silly "reboot" in the   
   planning? Yep, "Charmed", not silly "Buffy".  :-p   
      
   Of course, hopefully that silly "reboot" plan gets dropped before they   
   even make it, since like all idiotic "reboots", it'll be dreadful crap   
   with no real resemblance to the original other than stealing the name   
   and, if you're lucky, the very basic core idea.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)