XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: YourName@YourISP.com
In article , David Johnston
wrote:
> On 3/27/2017 2:23 PM, Your Name wrote:
> > In article , Mad Hamish
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:38:52 +1300, Your Name
> >> wrote:
> >>> In article ,
> >>> anim8rfsk wrote:
> >>>> In article ,
> >>>> Robin Miller wrote:
> >>>>> Your Name wrote:
> >>>>>> In article , Ubiquitous
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> 1) Sarah Michelle Gellar
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I meant to comment also. She was good as Buffy, but has she been good
in
> >>>>> anything else?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cruel Intentions
> >>>> The Simpsons
> >>>> Simply Irresistible
> >>>> I Know What Your Breasts Did Two Summers Before Last
> >>>> The Crazy Ones
> >>>> Spenser: For Hire
> >>>>
> >>>> She's done a *lot* of stuff I just had no interest in tracking down, so
> >>>> I have no idea if she was good in it or not.
> >>>
> >>> She completely ruined "Scooby Doo" by trying to make herself and her
> >>> character *THE* star of the show.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'm sure that she could completely overrule the director...
> >
> > It was her own production company supplying the money, so she could
> > simply fire the director and get another one.
>
> I don't think there was ever a chance that a live action Scooby Doo
> would be a good movie.
Probably not. Most live-action versions of animated originals do turn
out to be utter crap (The Smurfs being a recent example, although that
was laregly due to changing it into a Chipmunks knock-off). The
Flintstones was quite well done - there was some miscasting, especially
in the second movie, but it's probably the best of the bunch.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
