XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: dtravel@sonic.net
On 7/26/2018 7:10 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> On 2018-07-26 7:56 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>> In article , YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
>>
>>> The media these days stupidly uses the term "reboot" to mean any old
>>> show that is being brought back into production, whether that's an
>>> actual 'reboot', or a 're-imagination', or even just a 'resurrection'
>>> with a properly done sequel / follow-on series.
>>>
>>> From ComingSoon.net ...
>>>
>>> Buffy reboot will follow new slayer, showrunner confirms
>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>> It was officially announced last week that the hit WB series
>>> Buffy the Vampire Slayer is getting the reboot treatment at
>>> Fox with a black actress leading the series! Fan reaction as
>>> mixed at first as it was initially seen as though Sarah
>>> Michelle Gellar's portrayal would be replaced. However, new
>>> showrunner Monica Owusu-Breen (Alias) has just confirmed
>>> that the new series will not be replacing Gellar in the
>>> titular role, but rather will focus on a new slayer.
>>
>> I thought there could only be one "slayer" at a time?
>>
> Not by the end of the series. They'd rewritten the slayer spell so that
> all the potential slayers became actual. I thought that not considering
> the reason why the spell was so limited in the first place was liable to
> make this decision a terrible mistake.
At what point in fetal development does Slayer potential kick in?
--
Inquiring minds want to know while minds with a self-preservation
instinct are running screaming.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
