XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: liam@valentijn.nu
Op 28-7-2018 om 04:30 schreef anim8rfsk:
> In article , "David"
> wrote:
>
>> "anim8rfsk" wrote in message
>> news:anim8rfsk-0D2D0C.20193326072018@news.easynews.com...
>>
>> In article ,
>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>
>>> In article , YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> The media these days stupidly uses the term "reboot" to mean any old
>>>> show that is being brought back into production, whether that's an
>>>> actual 'reboot', or a 're-imagination', or even just a 'resurrection'
>>>> with a properly done sequel / follow-on series.
>>>>
>>> >From ComingSoon.net ...
>>>>
>>>> Buffy reboot will follow new slayer, showrunner confirms
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>> It was officially announced last week that the hit WB series
>>>> Buffy the Vampire Slayer is getting the reboot treatment at
>>>> Fox with a black actress leading the series! Fan reaction as
>>>> mixed at first as it was initially seen as though Sarah
>>>> Michelle Gellar's portrayal would be replaced. However, new
>>>> showrunner Monica Owusu-Breen (Alias) has just confirmed
>>>> that the new series will not be replacing Gellar in the
>>>> titular role, but rather will focus on a new slayer.
>>>
>>> I thought there could only be one "slayer" at a time?
>>
>> There are all *kinds* of loopholes in that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe is is a Slayer way before Buffy,
>
> That would actually be interesting.
>
Maybe, but that way lay many pitfalls. Remember the Trek sequel shows
and the Wars prequel movies?
--
Wouter Valentijn
"We are the gift from our ancestors to the world that we borrow from
future generations, so, however, whatever, whichever, whenever, wherever
or whoever we are, we better be at our best."
http://www.prozaportal.j3v.net
http://www.essayportal.j3v.net
liam=mail
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
