XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: anim8rfsk@cox.net
In article <5b5c6d03$0$2951$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter Valentijn wrote:
> Op 27-7-2018 om 20:32 schreef Scott Lurndal:
> > Wouter Valentijn writes:
> >> Op 27-7-2018 om 17:10 schreef Ubiquitous:
> >>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> >>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
> >>>>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> >>>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>> I thought there could only be one "slayer" at a time?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There are all *kinds* of loopholes in that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, I remember Faith and the "Buffies", so I guess they
> >>>>> abandoned that premise.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So I guess I am wondering where in the show's timeline does this occur.
> >>>>
> >>>> I doubt it does. It sounds like they're just throwing out the real
> >>>> show.
> >>>
> >>> In other words, they are acknowledging that season should be ignored.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Unknown at this point.
> >
> > It's been almost a quarter of a century since the series started. I
> > suspect
> > they won't worry too much about continuity by assuming that the audience
> > will
> > be, for the most part, new to the show.
> >
> > Making a show to pander to the (aging) current btvs fans doesn't seem to be
> > a particulary profitable move.
> >
>
> Unknown at this point.
> However, since the new showrunner has stated this will be a NEW Slayer,
> odds are they will keep the old series in mind and try to honor the
> "old" fans.
That's exactly what they're claiming now. It's amazing they're having
to do this much damage control this early in the process.
--
Join your old RAT friends at
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1688985234647266/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
