XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: anim8rfsk@cox.net
In article ,
Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article , daviderl31@yahoo.com wrote:
> >"anim8rfsk" wrote:
> > Ubiquitous wrote:
> >> YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
>
> >> >The media these days stupidly uses the term "reboot" to mean any old
> >> >show that is being brought back into production, whether that's an
> >> >actual 'reboot', or a 're-imagination', or even just a 'resurrection'
> >> >with a properly done sequel / follow-on series.
> >> >
> >> >From ComingSoon.net ...
> >> >
> >> > Buffy reboot will follow new slayer, showrunner confirms
> >> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >> > It was officially announced last week that the hit WB series
> >> > Buffy the Vampire Slayer is getting the reboot treatment at
> >> > Fox with a black actress leading the series! Fan reaction as
> >> > mixed at first as it was initially seen as though Sarah
> >> > Michelle Gellar's portrayal would be replaced. However, new
> >> > showrunner Monica Owusu-Breen (Alias) has just confirmed
> >> > that the new series will not be replacing Gellar in the
> >> > titular role, but rather will focus on a new slayer.
> >>
> >> I thought there could only be one "slayer" at a time?
> >
> >There are all *kinds* of loopholes in that.
> >
> >Maybe is is a Slayer way before Buffy,
>
> That could be interesting. Since CW is so full-on PC, they could do a series
> with a Pam Grier look-alike as a blackula hunter.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-3YWDRPQQ4
We've already seen that in flashback on the real show.
--
Join your old RAT friends at
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1688985234647266/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
