XPost: rec.arts.tv
From: weberm@polaris.net
liam@valentijn.nu wrote:
>Op 29-7-2018 om 08:08 schreef anim8rfsk:
>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> In article , daviderl31@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>> "anim8rfsk" wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>> YourName@YourISP.com wrote:
>>>>>> The media these days stupidly uses the term "reboot" to mean any old
>>>>>> show that is being brought back into production, whether that's an
>>>>>> actual 'reboot', or a 're-imagination', or even just a 'resurrection'
>>>>>> with a properly done sequel / follow-on series.
>>>>>>
>>>>> >From ComingSoon.net ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Buffy reboot will follow new slayer, showrunner confirms
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> It was officially announced last week that the hit WB series
>>>>>> Buffy the Vampire Slayer is getting the reboot treatment at
>>>>>> Fox with a black actress leading the series! Fan reaction as
>>>>>> mixed at first as it was initially seen as though Sarah
>>>>>> Michelle Gellar's portrayal would be replaced. However, new
>>>>>> showrunner Monica Owusu-Breen (Alias) has just confirmed
>>>>>> that the new series will not be replacing Gellar in the
>>>>>> titular role, but rather will focus on a new slayer.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought there could only be one "slayer" at a time?
>>>>
>>>> There are all *kinds* of loopholes in that.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe is is a Slayer way before Buffy,
>>>
>>> That could be interesting. Since CW is so full-on PC, they could do a
>>> series with a Pam Grier look-alike as a blackula hunter.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-3YWDRPQQ4
>>
>> We've already seen that in flashback on the real show.
>
>Spike's second Slayer kill.
Oh yeah, I think I saw that one...
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
