From: kevinsmirnov2011@gmail.com   
      
   On October 2, 2016, while attending Paris Fashion Week, Kardashian was robbed   
   at gunpoint in the apartment where she was staying. Five individuals, dressed   
   as police officers, bound and gagged her, then stole $10 million worth of   
   jewelry.[174] The    
   thieves got in her residence by threatening the concierge. Once they accessed   
   Kardashian's room, they held a gun to her head, tying her wrists and legs and   
   wrapping duct tape around her mouth as a gag.[175] Kardashian, who was placed   
   in the bathtub, was    
   physically unharmed and reportedly begged for her life.[176][177][178] She   
   managed to wriggle her hands free from the plastic ties around her wrists and   
   scream for help. The thieves escaped.[179] On October 6, 2016, it was revealed   
   that filming for the    
   next season of Keeping up with the Kardashians had been placed "on hold   
   indefinitely" after the robbery.[180]   
      
   Kim Kardashian Sex Tape Watch - Online Now Part 1 target   
   DOWNLOAD https://9intybobsno.blogspot.com/?hn=2wHtbe   
      
      
      
   Joel McHale has made a living poking fun at pop culture and reality shows as   
   host of "The Soup," and for the most part, he says that his targets have taken   
   it in stride. It seems, at least from the audience's perspective, that he has   
   carte blanche to    
   take the gloves off, but as he tells Just Jared, having his show on the same   
   parent network as the world's biggest reality stars can cause some major   
   complications.   
      
   In late 2018, Pew Research Center reported that social media sites had   
   surpassed print newspapers as a news source for Americans, when one in five   
   U.S. adults reported that they often got the news via social media.i By the   
   following year, that figure had    
   increased to 28% and the trend is only risingii. Combine that with a deeply   
   divided polity headed into a bitterly divisive 2020 U.S. presidential election   
   season and it becomes crucial to understand the information that Americans are   
   exposed to online    
   about political candidates and the topics they are discussing. It is equally   
   important to explore how online discourse might be used to intentionally   
   distort information and create and exploit misgivings about particular   
   identity groups based on religion,   
    race or other characteristics.   
      
   Collect and share data on identity-based hate: Developing ways to counter   
   online hate requires that we know which groups are targeted, the extent to   
   which they are targeted, and the nature of the attacks. Without this   
   information, it is impossible for    
   platforms, researchers, and civil society to address these problems in a way   
   that is informed by empirical evidence.   
      
   Expand tools and services for targets of hate: At present, Platforms are doing   
   little to nothing for targets of hate. Platforms should offer far more   
   services and tools for individuals facing or fearing online attacks, including   
   assisting with tracking    
   and capturing information, providing resources, and creating better   
   customization options to mitigate harm.   
      
   Dedicate resources to studying the impacts of online hate: Congress should   
   commission a report to study how the online hate ecosystem impacts the   
   election process, how misinformation sways voters, and how aspiring political   
   candidates at every level are    
   impacted by content that targets them based on their identity.   
      
   The United States presidential and midterm elections of 2016 and 2018 saw an   
   unprecedented rise in the use of social media for online political canvassing   
   and discussion. Subsequent studies explored the nature of the disinformation   
   and toxicity that    
   engulfed political discourse on the internet during those election cycles,   
   finding that many of the efforts to divide Americans were driven by bot   
   activityvi as well as by non-state actorsvii. Over the same period, ADL also   
   tracked a significant rise in    
   harassing conduct and antisemitic content targeting Jewish social media   
   usersiii,ix This research is all the more necessary because social media   
   platforms do not provide any transparency around the scope, reach, and nature   
   of content used to attack    
   identity-based groups, like the Jewish, Black, Muslim, Hispanic, LGBTQ+ and   
   other communities on their respective platforms.   
      
      
      
   The most prominent conspiracy theory targeting Jewish incumbents relates to   
   George Soros, the Hungarian-American Jewish billionaire financier,   
   philanthropist and Holocaust survivor. Soros, 89, got his start in   
   philanthropy supporting the fall of    
   Communism and transition to (more) open societies in the former Soviet Union   
   and communist bloc countries. Beginning in the mid-1990s, he expanded his   
   philanthropic focus to the United States and has since donated billions of   
   dollars of his personal    
   wealth to liberal and anti-authoritarian causes around the world, making him a   
   favored target among many on the extreme-rightxii. Conspiracy theorists often   
   insert Soros into a series of repackaged historical antisemitic myths,   
   particularly the notion    
   that rich and powerful Jews work behind the scenes, plotting to control   
   countries and manipulate global eventsxiii.   
      
   Developing ways to counter online hate requires that we know who is being   
   targeted, the extent to which they are targeted, and the nature of the   
   attacks. Without this information, it is impossible for platforms,   
   researchers, and civil society to create    
   solutions to these problems in a way that is informed by empirical evidence.   
   Platforms should adopt robust accountability and transparency standards. This   
   should include regularly scheduled external, independent audits so that the   
   public knows the extent    
   of hate and harassment on a given platform, with a focus on quantifying   
   violative content that targets each group with a breakdown on how those groups   
   are being targeted. Audits would also allow the public to verify that the   
   company followed through on    
   its stated actions and to assess the effectiveness of company efforts across   
   time. Companies should provide information from the audit and elsewhere   
   through more robust transparency reports.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)