XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.immigration, alt.politics.usa
XPost: ca.politics
From: NoBody@nowhere.com
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:36:12 -0500, The World of Izz
wrote:
>Collectivism_Always_Fails wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:18:55 -0400, Governor Swill
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:34:44 -0400, Collectivism_Always_Fails
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 21:05:01 -0400, Ubiquitous
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The insurrection continues apace. California officials, including Nancy
>>>>> Pelosi, have threatened to arrest and criminally prosecute ICE agents who
>>>>> allegedly violate California law. Pelosi and Congressman Kevin Mullin
issued
>>>>> this press release on Wednesday:
>>>>>
>>>>> :Reports of a planned mass immigration raid in the Bay Area are an
appalling
>>>>> :abuse of law enforcement power. Broad sweeps that target families and
>>>>> :terrorize law-abiding residents betray our nation’s values and waste
>>>>> :resources that should focus on real threats to public safety.
>>>>> :
>>>>> :It is important to note that California law protects communities and
>>>>> :prevents federal agents from taking certain actions here that we have
>>>>> :witnessed in other states. While the President may enjoy absolute
immunity
>>>>> :courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his orders
do
>>>>> :not. Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they
>>>>> :break California law — and if they are convicted, the President cannot
>>>>> :pardon them.
>>>>> :
>>>>> :The people of San Francisco will continue to stand with the patriotic
>>>>> :immigrants who are the constant reinvigoration of America. We will not
be
>>>>> :intimidated by politically motivated fear tactics.
>>>>> :
>>>>> This statement can charitably be described as disgraceful. What are the
>>>>> “certain actions” that federal agents have taken elsewhere that
supposedly
>>>>> would be illegal in California, and under what California laws? Pelosi
>>>>> isn’t saying. The reference to “his rogue Supreme Court” is outrageous,
>>>>> as is the threat that convictions under state law would be beyond
>>>>> presidential pardon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yesterday, the Department of Justice fired back:
>>>>>
>>>>> :The Justice Department on Thursday warned California officials,
including
>>>>> :Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), against engaging in an “apparent criminal
>>>>> :conspiracy” to arrest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
>>>>> :
>>>>> :Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued the letter to Pelosi, Gov.
>>>>> :Gavin Newsom, state Attorney General Rob Bonta and San Francisco
District
>>>>> :Attorney Brooke Jenkins after the former House speaker suggested
Wednesday
>>>>> :that local police could arrest ICE agents if they violate state laws
while
>>>>> :carrying out immigration enforcement operations.
>>>>> :
>>>>> :“Rather than supporting and working with federal law enforcement
>>>>> :professionals, California politicians, including U.S. Representative
Nancy
>>>>> :Pelosi and San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, have instead
>>>>> :called for state and local law enforcement officials to ‘arrest’ federal
>>>>> :agents and officers for enforcing federal laws enacted by the U.S.
Congress,
>>>>> :including federal immigration laws,” Blanche wrote in his missive.
>>>>> :
>>>>> :“The Department of Justice views any arrests of federal agents and
officers
>>>>> :in the performance of their official duties as both illegal and
futile,” he
>>>>> :added. “Numerous federal laws prohibit interfering with and impeding
>>>>> :immigration or other law-enforcement operations.”
>>>>> :
>>>>> :Blanche said the DOJ would “investigate and prosecute any state or local
>>>>> :official” who flouts federal statutes or directs or conspires with
others
>>>>> :to violate them.
>>>>>
>>>>> The prospect of arrests and counter-arrests is disheartening, to say the
>>>>> least. What is going on here is not a legitimate state-based concern
about
>>>>> specific actions of law enforcement, but rather an unconstitutional
>>>>> obstruction of the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Under the
>>>>> Supremacy Clause, federal law takes precedence over state law. The states
>>>>> have no ability to nullify immigration law, and any attempt to obstruct
>>>>> the execution of federal law would be, as Assistant Attorney General
>>>>> Blanche wrote, a crime.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Democrats are becoming ever more insurrectionist, with consequences
>>>>> that are impossible to foresee, but are likely to be catastrophic.
>>>>
>>>> Interfering with federal agents doing their job is a felony.
>>>
>>> Civil disobedience has long been a form of protest used by, not just
>>> Americans, but other peoples as well.
>>
>> They best be careful because interfering with federal agents doing
>> their job is a felony.
>
>Civil iseobeience covers it. The law is wrojng becausr immigrants are
>being taken here an there an it's not about their criminal recor it's
>only if they are not in a visa hearing. Perhaps it will be reuce to a
>felony when more people take up the cross. ICE is unfairly clogging our
>highways with their vehicles. I in't plan on these agents cluttering up
>the highway with.
Meanwhile illegal alien truckers are given licenses and actually kill
people. You're concerned about traffic????
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
