XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.immigration, alt.politics.usa
XPost: ca.politics
From: jfwalby@gmaill.com
NoBody wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 19:36:12 -0500, The World of Izz
> wrote:
>
>> Collectivism_Always_Fails wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:18:55 -0400, Governor Swill
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:34:44 -0400, Collectivism_Always_Fails
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 21:05:01 -0400, Ubiquitous
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The insurrection continues apace. California officials, including Nancy
>>>>>> Pelosi, have threatened to arrest and criminally prosecute ICE agents
who
>>>>>> allegedly violate California law. Pelosi and Congressman Kevin Mullin
issued
>>>>>> this press release on Wednesday:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :Reports of a planned mass immigration raid in the Bay Area are an
appalling
>>>>>> :abuse of law enforcement power. Broad sweeps that target families and
>>>>>> :terrorize law-abiding residents betray our nation’s values and waste
>>>>>> :resources that should focus on real threats to public safety.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :It is important to note that California law protects communities and
>>>>>> :prevents federal agents from taking certain actions here that we have
>>>>>> :witnessed in other states. While the President may enjoy absolute
immunity
>>>>>> :courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his
orders do
>>>>>> :not. Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they
>>>>>> :break California law — and if they are convicted, the President
cannot
>>>>>> :pardon them.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :The people of San Francisco will continue to stand with the patriotic
>>>>>> :immigrants who are the constant reinvigoration of America. We will not
be
>>>>>> :intimidated by politically motivated fear tactics.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> This statement can charitably be described as disgraceful. What are the
>>>>>> “certain actions” that federal agents have taken elsewhere that
supposedly
>>>>>> would be illegal in California, and under what California laws? Pelosi
>>>>>> isn’t saying. The reference to “his rogue Supreme Court” is
outrageous,
>>>>>> as is the threat that convictions under state law would be beyond
>>>>>> presidential pardon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yesterday, the Department of Justice fired back:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :The Justice Department on Thursday warned California officials,
including
>>>>>> :Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), against engaging in an “apparent
criminal
>>>>>> :conspiracy” to arrest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
agents.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued the letter to Pelosi, Gov.
>>>>>> :Gavin Newsom, state Attorney General Rob Bonta and San Francisco
District
>>>>>> :Attorney Brooke Jenkins after the former House speaker suggested
Wednesday
>>>>>> :that local police could arrest ICE agents if they violate state laws
while
>>>>>> :carrying out immigration enforcement operations.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :“Rather than supporting and working with federal law enforcement
>>>>>> :professionals, California politicians, including U.S. Representative
Nancy
>>>>>> :Pelosi and San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, have instead
>>>>>> :called for state and local law enforcement officials to ‘arrest’
federal
>>>>>> :agents and officers for enforcing federal laws enacted by the U.S.
Congress,
>>>>>> :including federal immigration laws,” Blanche wrote in his missive.
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :“The Department of Justice views any arrests of federal agents and
officers
>>>>>> :in the performance of their official duties as both illegal and
futile,” he
>>>>>> :added. “Numerous federal laws prohibit interfering with and impeding
>>>>>> :immigration or other law-enforcement operations.”
>>>>>> :
>>>>>> :Blanche said the DOJ would “investigate and prosecute any state or
local
>>>>>> :official” who flouts federal statutes or directs or conspires with
others
>>>>>> :to violate them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The prospect of arrests and counter-arrests is disheartening, to say the
>>>>>> least. What is going on here is not a legitimate state-based concern
about
>>>>>> specific actions of law enforcement, but rather an unconstitutional
>>>>>> obstruction of the enforcement of federal immigration laws. Under the
>>>>>> Supremacy Clause, federal law takes precedence over state law. The
states
>>>>>> have no ability to nullify immigration law, and any attempt to obstruct
>>>>>> the execution of federal law would be, as Assistant Attorney General
>>>>>> Blanche wrote, a crime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Democrats are becoming ever more insurrectionist, with consequences
>>>>>> that are impossible to foresee, but are likely to be catastrophic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interfering with federal agents doing their job is a felony.
>>>>
>>>> Civil disobedience has long been a form of protest used by, not just
>>>> Americans, but other peoples as well.
>>>
>>> They best be careful because interfering with federal agents doing
>>> their job is a felony.
>>
>> Civil iseobeience covers it. The law is wrojng becausr immigrants are
>> being taken here an there an it's not about their criminal recor it's
>> only if they are not in a visa hearing. Perhaps it will be reuce to a
>> felony when more people take up the cross. ICE is unfairly clogging our
>> highways with their vehicles. I in't plan on these agents cluttering up
>> the highway with.
>
> Meanwhile illegal alien truckers are given licenses and actually kill
> people. You're concerned about traffic????
>
I really am concerned about traffic. What does ICE offer me except an
unsolicited benefit? I didn't invite them. They are freeloading on my
good will.
--
collaborate
!believe
protect
!hunt
"We will delve into what it means to be inhuman
You will see a perversion a corruption of the flesh
by all means unnatural
by violence
by toxin
by madness."
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
