home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.tv.red-dwarf      Fans of amusing British sci-fi madness      21,297 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,030 of 21,297   
   John Santos to All   
   Re: British Subjecthood   
   15 Jan 08 13:57:48   
   
   XPost: news.admin.net-abuse.email   
   From: john.santos@post.harvard.edu   
      
   In article ,   
   john.santos@post.harvard.edu says...   
   > own being; we desire to live an imaginary life in the mind of others,   
   > and for this purpose we endeavour to shine. We labour unceasingly to adorn   
   > and preserve this imaginary existence and neglect the real. And if we   
   > possess calmness, or generosity, or truthfulness, we are eager to make it   
   > known, so as to attach these virtues to that imaginary existence. We would   
   > rather separate them from ourselves to join them to it; and we would   
   > willingly be cowards in order to acquire the reputation of being brave. A   
   > great proof of the nothingness of our being, not to be satisfied with the   
   > one without the other, and to renounce the one for the other! For he would   
   > be infamous who would not die to preserve his honour.   
   >   
   > 148. We are so presumptuous that we would wish to be known by all the world,   
   > even by people who shall come after, when we shall be no more; and we are so   
   > vain that the esteem of five or six neighbours delights and contents us.   
   >   
   > 149. We do not trouble ourselves about being esteemed in the towns through   
   > which we pass. But if we are to remain a little while there, we are so   
   > concerned. How long is necessary? A time commensurate with our vain and   
   > paltry life.   
   >   
   > 150. Vanity is so anchored in the heart of man that a soldier, a soldier's   
   > servant, a cook, a porter brags and wishes to have his admirers. Even   
   > philosophers wish for them. Those who write against it want to have the   
   > glory of having written well; and those who read it desire the gl   
      
   Huh?  I didn't post this.  Seems like a trivial waste of bandwidth.   
      
   I assume this was either posted by a lunatic or by someone experimenting   
   with usenet forgery, but you would think they would post in a group I'm   
   unlikely to read.  Anyone have a clue as to why they might have done   
   this?   
      
      
   --   
   John   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca