From: fache@SPAMclara.net   
      
   On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:34:42 +1000, NBL wrote:   
      
   >Lister wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:26:06 +1000, NBL wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Peter Chant wrote:   
   >>>> NBL wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Well that's my 2$£'s worth. (:   
   >>>>> See you in SL.   
   >>>> I just don't get the idea of Second Life. Anyway, if your a dwarfer you   
   >>>> need Better Than Life...   
   >>>>   
   >>> Good point!   
   >>> It's just that SL is the closest thing to BTL cyberspace has to offer at   
   >>> the moment. Which will of course change. But not till as in BTL, the   
   >>> interface is with electrodes and not mouse, keyboard, and screen.   
   >>>   
   >>> I sort of see SL as just a more amusing form of usenet. Something   
   >>> interesting to look at and listen to besides text, while chatting.   
   >>>   
   >>> -NoBloodyLicence   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Perhaps someone should come up with a SL-like game and call it BTL?   
   >> I'd do it :)   
   >   
   >lol   
   >So would I if I had the money and or scripting skills! (:   
   >   
   >Actually, after posting my last reply, I thought that there really isn't   
   >much difference between SL and BTL (except for the interface that is).   
   >You can do all the same stuff as in BTL. Like walk through a door and   
   >be instantly teleported to a beach, rez bikes and cars on the beach and   
   >drive/ride them, go golfing and have Marlene Munro in a bed on the golf   
   >course, have children with someone, dress any way you like, eat and   
   >drink anything you want in restaurants, go clubbing, whatever. About   
   >the only thing you can't do, is pull unlimited amounts of cash out of   
   >your pocket, unless of course you really do have unlimited amounts of   
   >cash. (:   
   >   
   >-NBL   
      
      
   Maybe you7 could hack into the SL servers and give yourself unlimited   
   cash :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|