Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.tv.simpsons    |    Worshipping Matt Groening    |    29,105 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,299 of 29,105    |
|    Keith F. Lynch to All    |
|    Football post-game show on WTTG in DC    |
|    07 Jan 13 03:53:46    |
      From: kfl@KeithLynch.net              I tuned into WTTG Fox channel 5 at 8 pm EST tonight, expecting to see       The Simpsons. There was a football post-game show on. I was pleased       that the game itself was over, and expected they'd switch to The       Simpsons within a minute or two, perhaps after a short commercial       break.              After several minutes, there was a very long commercial break. I       waited patiently. What's this? They returned to the post-game       show. No mention of The Simpsons. I waited some more, then there       was another long commercial break, with many of the exact same       commercials. After which they returned to the post-game show again.       I only gave up after 20 minutes.              There was nothing in the corner of the screen saying when, if at all,       The Simpsons would be on. There was nothing useful on their website.       Even if football fans are so much more important than Simpsons fans,       is a scroll of a few seconds at the bottom of the screen really too       much to ask? Are Simpsons fans infinitely less important than       football fans, even when the actual game is long over? If so, why       don't they sell The Simpsons to a different network and show nothing       but football games, pre-game shows, post-game shows, and reruns of       those 24x7? Why waste time producing and advertising shows and not       showing them? Do they expect Simpsons fans to patiently wait, staring       at the screen all evening? Or to check back every five minutes, not       minding if they miss the first four minutes of the show?              I don't get it. You'd think that football game was the most important       news story since 9/11. What is there to say about it that takes 20       minutes or more, anyway? Anyone who watched the game already knows       what happens. Anyone who didn't watch it doesn't care. There may be       a few football fans who didn't get home until 8 pm, but you'd think a       30-second recap would suffice. Or perhaps they could rebroadcast the       whole game at midnight or whenever, for those who missed it the first       time. The vast majority of people who tuned in at 8 pm were looking       for just one thing, and it wasn't discussion, already in progress, of       a game that ended some time earlier.              Does Fox really want to lose all its viewers except football fans?       How do such morons get to be program directors, anyway? Especially in       today's economy where even the most competent and skilled are at risk       of losing their jobs.       --       Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/       Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca