From: invalid@invalid.invalid   
      
   On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:23:25 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:   
      
   >Jeßus  wrote in news:mk61b9l9qc5anuit4st0mbl9mpq47rcb8t@   
   >4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:51:10 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Very few long-running series can maintain the   
   >>>quality that the Simpsons has.   
   >>   
   >> No show (or artist) can maintain quality over a very long period.   
   >>   
   >> The difference is many other shows had the integrity and good taste to   
   >> stop before a long decline set in and knew when to stop.   
   >>   
   >   
   >The Simpsons hasn't reached that point yet.   
      
   It reached it in about 1990.   
      
   >It's only you fanatics who have nothing to do but complain about   
   >anything and everything to anybody who'll listen (and to those who don't   
   >want to hear it) that's the problem.   
      
   Seemed to get some responses, favorable and unfavorable.    Can't deal   
   with discussion?   
      
   >Shut up.  Problem solved.   
      
   No.  'The Simpsons' would continue to suck.   
      
   >What's so hard for you to understand "Don't like it? Dont' watch it.   
   >And stop your childish whining."?   
      
   What's so hard for you to understand?  Don't like reading your   
   favorite fading kiddy show criticized?  Unsubscribe from the   
   newsgroup.  And stop your childish whining!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)