From: none@all.org   
      
   On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:03:06 -0800, The 'Brightness' control still   
   doesn't help  wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 05:23:25 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:   
   >   
   >>Jeßus  wrote in news:mk61b9l9qc5anuit4st0mbl9mpq47rcb8t@   
   >>4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:51:10 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Very few long-running series can maintain the   
   >>>>quality that the Simpsons has.   
   >>>   
   >>> No show (or artist) can maintain quality over a very long period.   
   >>>   
   >>> The difference is many other shows had the integrity and good taste to   
   >>> stop before a long decline set in and knew when to stop.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>The Simpsons hasn't reached that point yet.   
   >   
   >It reached it in about 1990.   
   >   
   >>It's only you fanatics who have nothing to do but complain about   
   >>anything and everything to anybody who'll listen (and to those who don't   
   >>want to hear it) that's the problem.   
   >   
   >Seemed to get some responses, favorable and unfavorable.    Can't deal   
   >with discussion?   
   >   
   >>Shut up.  Problem solved.   
   >   
   >No.  'The Simpsons' would continue to suck.   
   >   
   >>What's so hard for you to understand "Don't like it? Dont' watch it.   
   >>And stop your childish whining."?   
   >   
   >What's so hard for you to understand?  Don't like reading your   
   >favorite fading kiddy show criticized?  Unsubscribe from the   
   >newsgroup.  And stop your childish whining!   
      
   This 'wiseguy' appears to be anything *but* wise... common logic is a   
   foreign concept for him, it seems :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)