From: epwise@yahoo.com   
      
   sparkoheaps@gmail.com wrote in   
   news:b9eac196-8a87-46ef-b799-ba1a8cc1711b@googlegroups.com:   
      
   > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:15:30 PM UTC-6, Wiseguy wrote:   
   >> Sarah Tonen  wrote in   
   >>   
   >> news:adaon95hhi05hm5khk2idrqutdb9ie6tgr@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On Wed, 21 May 2014 04:06:19 GMT, Wiseguy  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> >>Matt Garvey  wrote in   
   >>   
   >> >>news:2859f053-f8bb-43e5-b704-2c974320c311@googlegroups.com:   
   >>   
   >> >>   
   >>   
   >> >>> OK episode, though not as touching as it seemed to be going for.   
   >>   
   >> >>> Lisa's narrating was interesting. Also a little broad in the   
   >> >>> humor   
   >>   
   >> >>> style and very very short.   
   >>   
   >> >>>   
   >>   
   >> >>   
   >>   
   >> >>It is amazing how the people who supposedly are the biggest fans of   
   >>   
   >> the   
   >>   
   >> >>series (like those who stupidly give it different names like OFF),   
   >> >>or   
   >>   
   >> at   
   >>   
   >> >>least the people who make the loudest noises about the series, are   
   >> >>the   
   >>   
   >> >>ones who criticize it the most and usually over anal and   
   >> >>unimportant   
   >>   
   >> >>reasons.   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> >>If you don't like the Simpsons, review something else.   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> > Ahhaha... classic. Only do a review if it's positive, right?   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> > Unless it is you who is doing the reviewing, such as you just did   
   >> > in   
   >>   
   >> > your reply here, right?   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Not at all.  You obviously didn't comprehend what I wrote.  Let me   
   >>   
   >> repeat:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> >>It is amazing how the people who supposedly are the biggest fans of   
   >> >>   
   >>   
   >> >>the series (like those who stupidly give it different names like   
   >> >>OFF),   
   >>   
   >> >>or at least the people who make the loudest noises about the   
   >> >>series,   
   >>   
   >> >>are the ones who criticize it the most and usually OVER ANAL AND   
   >>   
   >> >>UNIMPORTANT REASONS.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I've capitalized the words here so you can note them this time.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> The Simpsons isn't perfect and I never said it was.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> But to constantly complain (as Matt Garvey does) over the length of   
   >> the   
   >>   
   >> episode (all current series are shorter now) or the length of the   
   >> final   
   >>   
   >> act (really, to complain about that is ANAL) is silly.  And as I've   
   >>   
   >> noted before I still haven't seen one (not to mention 552) episodes   
   >> of   
   >>   
   >> Matt Garvey's perfect animated series which he created himself.   
   >   
   > LOL. If you don't like the review that get posted here, don't read   
   > them.   
   >   
      
   Reviews? You mean "Meh" and "This episode didn't do anything for me" and   
   "This episode is too short" are reviews?  Accompanied by a list of   
   production codes (without titles since everyone memorizes production   
   codes) where something similar happened (Homer says D'oh in AABF02!).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)