From: j@j.net   
      
   On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:30:58 +0100, Vidcapper    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 27/09/2016 08:01, Je?us wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:15:57 +0100, Vidcapper    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 24/09/2016 17:53, Keith F. Lynch wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Vidcapper  wrote:   
   >>>>> garfielf321@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>> I can catch up on the episodes I missed the first time they did it   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> I'd rather they'd just put the 'missing' episodes on DVD/Blu-Ray...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Likewise.  Why should I pay for cable every month whether I watch it   
   >>>> or not when I can pay for a set of DVDs just once and have them for   
   >>>> a lifetime?   
   >>>   
   >>> IMO, there should be immunity from copyright infringement, where the   
   >>> producers of a show refuse to make it available to legally purchase...   
   >>   
   >> That makes no sense. Should a car manufacturer that builds a concept   
   >> car then be forced to build it because some arse-clown wants to buy   
   >> one?   
   >>   
   >   
   >Are you familiar with the term 'reductio ad absurdum'? If not, I suggest   
   >you look it up.   
      
   I'm familiar with the concept of 'naughtius maximus'. Does that count?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)