From: wog-NotThisBit-george@amd-p.com   
      
   "George Weinberg"  wrote in message   
   news:Xns9924627276B3Eeorgeweinbergsbcglob@207.115.33.102...   
   > "Somebody"  wrote in   
   > news:CcKdnSeEJee2-6vbnZ2dnUVZ_hisnZ2d@insightbb.com:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> "That Guy" <7@f.com> wrote in message   
   >> news:kLSdnYJiCdK0wKvbnZ2dnUVZ_umlnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Somebody"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:h_mdnb6-kLYjxqvbnZ2dnUVZ_sOknZ2d@insightbb.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "That Guy" <7@f.com> wrote in message   
   >>>> news:rLudnebRpuDCcKjbnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> People see all the proof they need for whatever what they want to   
   >>>>> see. I believe it's called confirmation bias.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> fundamental attribution error   
   >>>   
   >>> That works, too.  There's only one thing that can be known for   
   >>> certain, everything else is just guesswork...   
   >>   
   >> what is that?   
   >>   
   >   
   > The fact itself that "only one thing can be known for certain" :-)   
   >   
   > Some radical skeptics will assert that nothing can be known for certain,   
   > but of course they can't know that, right?   
   >   
   > But the "one thing" version gets rids of the paradox.   
   >   
   >   
   Assuming just for a moment that you actually posted that message, I think I   
   agree... or not.   
      
   --   
   George   
   "I got such a raging clue that I almost shot clue goo all over Joe." - Frank   
   Hardly - 11 October 2006   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)