XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.tv.south-park   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article ,   
    Joel  wrote:   
      
   > Anim8rFSK  wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >> On balance, though, it's undeniable that so-called Christians are far   
   > >> >> less tolerant of Islam than Muslims are of Christianity, in general.   
   > >> >   
   > >> >Yep, there it is.   
   > >>   
   > >Okay, now, wait for the unfounded personal attack ..   
   > >   
   > >> You're a complete idiot.  Learn how to read.   
   > >   
   > >Bingo!   
   > >   
   > >Now, wait for the repeat of the falsehood, as he foolishly thinks that   
   > >saying a stupid unfounded thing a second time validates it ...   
   >   
   >   
   > I thought,   
      
   No, clearly, you haven't.  Not yet.   
      
    obviously with an excess of optimism, that restating it   
   > with emphasis on why you were such a moron, might perhaps lead you to   
   > see why you're an illiterate, opinionated buffoon.   
      
   Well, since that assumes facts not in evidence, and would mean agreeing   
   with you, who has proven to be wrong in everything he says, that seems   
   unlikely, doesn't it?   
   >   
   >   
   > >> I stand by my statement.  Christians, far more so than Muslims, *in   
   > >> general*, have a superiority complex about their religion.   
   > >   
   > >BINGO!  Now, the follow up unfounded personal attack, since he didn't   
   > >have anything to actually say . . .   
   >   
   >   
   > You haven't "said" anything whatsoever, especially not to refute my   
   > statement, dweeb.  But that doesn't matter, 'cause your second-grade   
   > teacher thought you were special.   
      
   Your statement was self refuting.   You don't need me to prove you wrong.   
   >   
   >   
   > >> Your use of sarcasm in the midst of your illiterate rant exposes you   
   > >> as a pitiful nerd.   
   > >   
   > >Ah, the trifecta.  Also, please note that at no time did I rant nor was   
   > >I illiterate, but I do offer your reply a hearty PKB.   
   >   
   >   
   > Any reply that seeks to ignore context, in a vain attempt at pointing   
   > out some discrepancy that doesn't exist in the earlier post, is a   
   > rant.  You're a walking rant, geek.  Overdramatic, and just plain   
   > wrong.  And, no one cares about a "PKB".  You're a masturbator.  I   
   > scoff at your ignorant attempt at dragging me into some retarded   
   > Internet argument.  Your kind is boring, despite what some half-wits   
   > have apparently made you think by indulging your careless, juvenile,   
   > *illiterate* style of trolling.   
      
   Wow.  Somebody has some issues.  And is clearly projecting all his self   
   loathing and guilt on his betters.   
      
   BTW, "illiterate" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Why watch the Sci Fi Channel?   
   For every Flash Gordon, there is an Earthstorm!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)