Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.tv.southpark    |    They killed Kenny... those bastards!    |    8,068 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,875 of 8,068    |
|    dank to All    |
|    Re: PC gone wild in UK    |
|    05 Oct 07 17:38:15    |
      XPost: alt.flame.fucking.faggots, soc.culture.british, alt.polit       cs.homosexuality       From: dank@nugget.org               Death wrote...       > By LUKE SALKELD       > 4th October 2007       >       > Firemen who shone their torches at four men they found having sex in bushes       > have been disciplined by their bosses.       >       > The crew spotted the men engaged in illegal 'dogging' - outdoor sexual       > activity with strangers - on parkland known as the Downs in Bristol late       > one night.       >       > After embarrassing the men by pointing their torches at them, the crew       > continued on their way to their fire station.       > ...       > But one of the 'doggers' complained to Avon Fire and Rescue, ultimately       > accusing the four-man crew of being homophobic.       >       > The firemen, who have 26 years of service between them, were then suspended       > on full pay for three months during an internal investigation.       >       > Yesterday it emerged that two have been fined £1,000 each, another demoted       > to a rank which will see him forfeit a similar amount of money, while a       > fourth has received a stern written warning.       > ...       > The crew have been transferred to other stations and ordered to attend an       > equality course.       > ...       > Simon Nelson, the charity's acting regional manager, said: 'The member of       > the public simply wanted to know why the fire service was on the Downs at       > that time of day. We passed on that complaint.'       >       > Avon's chief fire officer Kevin Pearson said: 'There was no justifiable       > reason for that appliance to be in that location at that time. They should       > not have been there and there was no operational justification for their       > actions.              There was no justifiable reason for a person of any profession to be carrying       a flashlight as he walks to work at night. But this doesn't seem right for a       country with ubiquitous video surveillance to go around broacasting images of       minor criminal offenses all over teevee and the internet, then prosecute       someone for illuminating a crime scene with a flashlight. The local police       probably have already planted hidden cameras in the bushes and wank it to       the dogging action.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca