c3b98394
XPost: rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.pro-wrestling.wwf, rec.arts.tv
XPost: rec.arts.animation, alt.showbiz.gossip
From: noemail@here.invalidd
"Sarah Palin: Lie, Lie, Lie, Drill Drill Drill!"
wrote in message
news:ccfe0f94-458c-4e5b-80ad-735b29a387e7@k16g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Trey Parker and Matt Stone can't seem to keep themselves out of
> trouble. Paramount is now upset over the footage from their season
> premiere this past week of Steven Spielberg and George Lucas violently
> raping Indiana Jones.
Tell Paramount to go to Hell. Unless Comedy Central decides to step in, Trey
and Matt are free to lampoon whoever they want -- including Paramount, who
could end up seeing it happen if they don't stop acting like such morons.
"WAH! THEY MADE FUN OF US AND SAID OUR PRODUCT SUCKED!!!"
Bunch of babies. Geez, I'd think the PTC would be more pissed off about
Butters being naked in the tub than Paramount complaining about Indiana
Jones being someone's bitch.
(maybe if they hadn't made it happen in the first place...)
>
> For those who don't keep track, Viacom owns South Park. Viacom also
> owns Paramount which produces the Indiana Jones movies. See the
> problem?
>
> I think Viacom needs to grow a sense of humor. It's South Park,
> people! There is not a sacred cow they will not slaughter. If they
> haven't gotten to any particularly sacred cow yet, give them more
> time.
>
> Having seen the episode, I thought it was funny. The rape scenes in
> question are also homages to movies such as Deliverance and The
> Accused. Actually, South Park hasn't been the target of mainstream
> controversy since "The Return of Chef". This might be good publicity
> for them.
>
> In a previous episode, they had the Woodland Critters raping Popeye.
> How come nobody at Viacom complained about that one? I certainly found
> it disturbing.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
