From: wog-NotThisBit-george@amd-p.com   
      
   "Howard S Shubs"  wrote in message   
   news:howard-3B77E2.20272711102008@news.giganews.com...   
   > In article ,   
   > Tim Smith  wrote:   
   >   
   >> In article   
   >> <358182e3-2845-4504-bf06-5a8b75898c4d@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,   
   >>  tomcervo  wrote:   
   >> > On Oct 10, 8:54?pm, "Sarah Palin: Lie, Lie, Lie, Drill Drill Drill!"   
   >> >  wrote:   
   >> > > I think Viacom needs to grow a sense of humor. It's South Park,   
   >> > > people! There is not a sacred cow they will not slaughter. If they   
   >> > > haven't gotten to any particularly sacred cow yet, give them more   
   >> > > time.   
   >> >   
   >> > Aside from themselves?   
   >> > Michael Moore throws in a SP-like bit of animation into one of his   
   >> > movies and they go thermonuclear on him. The tough, hard-hitting   
   >> > satirists turn out to have the hide of a peach when it comes to being   
   >> > able to take a joke on them.   
   >>   
   >> Wasn't the reason they were upset NOT the animation itself, but rather   
   >> its placement in the film?  The way it was place would (and did)   
   >> naturally lead people to think that Parker and Stone had contributed   
   >> that animation to the film.   
   >   
   > NOTE: trim your followups.   
   >   
   >   
      
   The person Tim Smith was responding to subscribes to one of the groups that   
   you trimmed.  If crossposting bothers you, you are free to not do it.  If   
   crossposting doesn't bother Tim or anyone else, they are free to do it till   
   the cows come home.   
      
   Translation for the terminally dim: Go fuck yourself!   
      
   --   
   George   
   "We don't want to jump to conclusions but we're worried that maybe someone   
   kidnapped Butters, sodomised him over and over, and then fed his genitals to   
   wild animals" - Steven Stotch - 17 October 2007   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)