XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, nf.general   
   From: Obveeus@aol.com   
      
   "Thanatos"  wrote in message   
   news:atropos-850F9B.16264622042010@news.giganews.com...   
   > In article ,   
   > "Obveeus"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Ubiquitous"  wrote in message   
   >> news:3uSdnVGyE-i7y03WnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >> > atropos@mac.com wrote:   
   >> >> "Obveeus"  wrote:   
   >> >>> "Thanatos"  wrote:   
   >> >>> > "Arizona Bushwhacker"  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>> >> These Muslims are just like fucking tea-baggers.   
   >> >>> >> Muslims never condemn terrorist Muslims and therefore   
   >> >>> >> every Muslim is a terrorist.  Just like how tea-baggers   
   >> >>> >> never condemn terrorist tea-baggers.  I guess that   
   >> >>> >> gives me the right to call EVERY tea-bagger a terrorist!   
   >> >>> >   
   >> >>> > Which Tea Party person is a terrorist again?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> The original ones from Boston.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>Vandalism is now terrorism?   
   >>   
   >> Destructive acts designed to bring down a government only count as   
   >> 'terrorism' if people die?   
   >   
   > Where exactly did I say that?   
      
   You claimed above that the Boston Tea Party was an act of vandalism, not   
   terrorism.  Since the desired effect was to scare/intimidate the legitimate   
   government and to local merchants, how was it not an act of 'terrorism'?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)