XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, nf.general   
   From: me@privacy.net   
      
   On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:26:46 -0400, Thanatos  wrote:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > "Obveeus"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Ubiquitous"  wrote in message   
   >> news:3uSdnVGyE-i7y03WnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >> > atropos@mac.com wrote:   
   >> >> "Obveeus"  wrote:   
   >> >>> "Thanatos"  wrote:   
   >> >>> > "Arizona Bushwhacker"  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >>> >> These Muslims are just like fucking tea-baggers.   
   >> >>> >> Muslims never condemn terrorist Muslims and therefore   
   >> >>> >> every Muslim is a terrorist.  Just like how tea-baggers   
   >> >>> >> never condemn terrorist tea-baggers.  I guess that   
   >> >>> >> gives me the right to call EVERY tea-bagger a terrorist!   
   >> >>> >   
   >> >>> > Which Tea Party person is a terrorist again?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> The original ones from Boston.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>Vandalism is now terrorism?   
   >>   
   >> Destructive acts designed to bring down a government only count as   
   >> 'terrorism' if people die?   
   >   
   >Where exactly did I say that?   
      
   Terrorism is designed to strike terror among the populace.  The Boston Tea   
   Party was designed to send a message to the government, not the people being   
   ruled.   Maybe if they'd been cutting off heads of British seamen and   
   throwing those in the ocean instead of tea, there would be some comparison.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)