XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: none@of.your.biz   
      
   On 27/10/2010 5:07 PM, Jim Gysin wrote:   
   > First off, you're replying to Seamus, which is why I didn't see the   
   > antecedent in the first place, so bear that in mind.   
      
   ???   
      
   He was replying to me. My name isn't Seamus.   
      
   > Secondly, 1b covers plagiarism, as it covers inherent copyright laws.   
      
   1b: an unlawful taking (as by embezzlement or burglary) of property   
      
   Nothing is "taken" (goes missing) with plagiarism and copyright   
   infringement.   
      
   > And one thing that Seamus (via whatever 'nym) has always admitted to   
   > being willing to violate is copyright law. In fact, if ever I were in   
   > doubt about whether a suspicious new name here was yet another   
   > incarnation of Seamus, I could probably post something about torrent   
   > pirates being unethical thieves and he would out himself in no time by   
   > defending the theft. :)   
      
   Then you must think Thanatos and others are all Seamus as well, since   
   Thanatos, for one, is aware of the important legal distinction between   
   copyright infringement and theft.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)