From: eastsidetraks@soothpark.net   
      
   While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian   
   redefinition.   
      
   A "conspiracy theory" no longer means an event explained by a   
   conspiracy. Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact,   
   that is out of step with the government's explanation and that of its   
   media pimps.   
      
   For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with   
   conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports   
   news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US   
   government does not endorse.   
      
   In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its   
   Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by   
   which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should   
   ignore.   
      
   When piles of carefully researched books, released government   
   documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald   
   was not President John F. Kennedy's assassin, the voluminous research,   
   government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as   
   "conspiracy theory".   
      
   In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the   
   authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the   
   interests of authorities.   
      
   The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the   
   media's (including many Internet sites') response to the large number   
   of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11,   
   2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about   
   physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires,   
   structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures   
   of the United States, NORAD's capabilities, air traffic control,   
   airport security, and other matters. These experts, numbering in the   
   thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media who   
   brand the experts as "conspiracy theorists".   
      
   This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the   
   official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human   
   history.   
      
   Let's take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official   
   explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the   
   fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy. The official truth is   
   that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes,   
   mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan,   
   outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16 US   
   intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies   
   including Israel's Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every   
   terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those   
   whom Mossad marks as terrorists.   
      
   In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United   
   States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted   
   the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport   
   security four times in the same hour on the same morning, air traffic   
   control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor   
   aircraft, and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings,   
   including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few   
   seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small,   
   short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.   
      
   The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics   
   and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed for   
   several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives   
   used in controlled demolition.   
      
   The story that the government and the media have told us amounts to a   
   gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film. Yet,   
   anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into   
   irrelevance by the obedient media.   
      
   Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer, or demolition   
   expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are blowing   
   up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who says   
   that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of   
   physics, anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots   
   or poorly-qualified pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers,   
   anyone who believes the 100 or more first responders who testify that   
   they not only heard explosions in the towers but personally   
   experienced explosions, anyone who believes University of Copenhagen   
   nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding unreacted nano-thermite   
   in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who is convinced by   
   experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.   
      
   In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world,   
   actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm of   
   kookiness. Only people who believe lies are socially approved and   
   accepted as patriotic citizens.   
      
   Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted to report the   
   findings of 9/11 skeptics. In other words, simply to report Professor   
   Harrit's findings now means that you endorse them or agree with them.   
   Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be   
   instantly fired if they report Harrit's findings, even with a laugh.   
   Thus, although Harrit has reported his findings on European television   
   and has lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the   
   fact that he and the international scientific research team that he   
   led found unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered   
   samples to other scientists to examine has to my knowledge never been   
   reported in the American media.   
      
   Even Internet sites on which I am among the readers' favorites will   
   not allow me to report on Harrit's findings.   
      
   As I reported earlier, I myself had experience with a Huffington Post   
   reporter who was keen to interview a Reagan presidential appointee who   
   was in disagreement with the Republican wars in the Middle East. After   
   he published the interview that I provided at his request, he was   
   terrified to learn that I had reported findings of 9/11 investigators.   
   To protect his career, he quickly inserted on the online interview   
   that my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could be dismissed   
   as I had reported unacceptable findings about 9/11.   
      
   The unwillingness or inability to entertain any view of 9/11 different   
   from the official view dooms to impotence many Internet sites that are   
   opposed to the wars and to the rise of the domestic US police state.   
   These sites, for whatever the reasons, accept the government's   
   explanation of 9/11; yet, they try to oppose the "war on terror" and   
   the police state which are the consequences of accepting the   
   government's explanation. Trying to oppose the consequences of an   
   event whose explanation you accept is an impossible task.   
      
   If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists and is   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)