ce97ef0b   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From: ivanhoe@nospam.com   
      
   Dale wrote:   
   > On May 22, 2:21 pm, Kevin Reilly  wrote:   
   >> Spoilers for Star Trek: The Reboot.   
   >>   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >>   
   >> There are a lot of discussions in these groups regarding methods by which   
   >   
   >> But going back and preventing the destruction of the USS Kelvin as has been   
   >> often discussed here? Kind of pointless, and ethically very questionable.   
   >> Some have suggested Spock Prime, with his future knowledge and scientific   
   >> background, might be the one to undertake such an endeavour. But while   
   >> Spock may be logical he's also a creature of morality and I just can't   
   >> imagine he'd be prepared to entertain it.   
   >>   
   >> --   
   >> Kev   
   >> __________________________________________________________________________   
   >> "That's what happens when, in cricketing parlance, the wheel comes off and   
   >>   you can't steer the boat."                                     Bob Willis   
   >   
   > The Ethics of time travel have never stop some from coming up with   
   > reason it ought ro be fix.  Your post is a breath or fresh air.   
      
   I hate fresh air     
      
   where the hell is my smog?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)