home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.tv.star-trek      William Shatner told 'em to get a life      5,051 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,064 of 5,051   
   David Johnston to tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us   
   Re: Implications of resetting the timeli   
   23 May 09 01:43:41   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.movies, alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.written   
   XPost: alt.tv.sevendays   
   From: david@block.net   
      
   On Fri, 22 May 2009 17:57:09 -0700, Tim Bruening   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >Kevin Reilly wrote:   
   >   
   >> Spoilers for Star Trek: The Reboot.   
   >>   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >> |   
   >>   
   >> There are a lot of discussions in these groups regarding methods by which   
   >> Nero could be retroactively prevented from destroying the USS Kelvin and   
   >> changing the course of history. Granted, the 40+ years of Star Trek   
   >> mythology are replete with examples of how this could be achieved, but has   
   >> anyone considered the implications for the citizens of the Federation, or   
   >> indeed the alternate universe as a whole?   
   >>   
   >> Nero's arrival was sudden and unexpected, and nobody knew the Narada was   
   >> from the future except for Captain Robau (and possibly some of his crew if   
   >> they were monitoring transmissions) who learned it from Nero just before he   
   >> was killed and his ship destroyed. Nero then took the damaged Narada,   
   >> disappeared and was not seen again *for 25 years*.   
   >>   
   >> Only with the arrival of Spock Prime and the destruction of Vulcan a   
   >> quarter century later did anyone learn just what the Narada was, where and   
   >> when it was from, and the fact that it was responsible for the creation of   
   >> an alternate timeline. Even given the possibility of preventing the   
   >> destruction of Vulcan in this new timeline, does it seem morally and   
   >> ethically right to consider erasing the last 25 years of every living being   
   >> in it?   
   >   
   >Harry Kim (Timeless) and Admiral Janeway (Endgame) didn't seem bothered by the   
   >idea of resetting everyone for 15 years (Timeless) and 26 years (Endgame) for   
   >the sake of saving their crew mates.   
   >   
      
   They were irresponsible idiots.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca