XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.movies   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article <3oc525tifpo91d9uvdj0ddm9ualbiivfcq@4ax.com>,   
    David Johnston  wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:54:29 -0700, Tim Bruening   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >"selaboc" wrote:   
   > >Tim Bruening  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> > > I have figured out what Spock should have done:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> > No you haven't, what you've figured out is another way to say the same   
   > >>> > crap you've been saying for weeks now.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> My newest suggestion woud not have involved creating a new timeline or   
   > >>> erasing an existing one.   
   > >>   
   > >> It also means that the entire movie would not have occurred. And that   
   > >> really the heart of your nonsense, *you* don't like the movie and it's   
   > >> plotline so you keep trying to find ways to "undo" it.   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > >The creators could have instead done a movie in which Spock and the   
   > >Next-Gen crew try to save Romulus from a supernova.  I believe that such   
   > >a movie would have been successful.   
   >   
   > I believe such a movie would have bombed.  It certainly wouldn't have   
   > have experienced the success of a fresh start.   
      
   That's the storyline of the prequel comic.   
      
   --   
   MEGA-SHARK VS GIANT OCTOPUS!   
   A new contender for "worst film of all time"   
   Deborah Gibson is like a Tracy Lords without talent.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)