361dce10   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.movies, alt.humor.puns   
   XPost: alt.humor   
   From: liam@valentijn.nu   
      
   selaboc wrote:   
   > On Jun 1, 1:48 am, Tim Bruening  wrote:   
   >> selaboc wrote:   
   >>> On May 30, 12:21 pm, "Wickeddoll"  wrote:   
   >>>> "selaboc" wrote:   
   >>>> Tim Bruening wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>>> I have figured out what Spock should have done:   
   >>   
   >>>>>>> No you haven't, what you've figured out is another way to say   
   >>>>>>> the same crap you've been saying for weeks now.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> My newest suggestion woud not have involved creating a new   
   >>>>>> timeline or erasing an existing one.   
   >>   
   >>>>> It also means that the entire movie would not have occurred. And   
   >>>>> that really the heart of your nonsense, *you* don't like the   
   >>>>> movie and it's plotline so you keep trying to find ways to "undo"   
   >>>>> it.   
   >>   
   >>>> OK, do I think Tim goes way overboard with his analyzing? Um,   
   >>>> yeah. But I don't know that it's fair to say he's picking the   
   >>>> movie apart because he secretly dislikes it.   
   >>   
   >>> Then you haven't been reading his posts. He;d prefer they had   
   >>> "instead done a movie in which Spock and the Next-Gen crew try to   
   >>> save Romulus from a supernova." He keeps looking for ways to undo   
   >>> the movie becuase he does not like the fact that they created a new   
   >>> timeline in which Vulcan is destroyed.   
   >>   
   >> Nor do I like the fact that Spock didn't go back in time to save   
   >> Vulcan, unlike previous episodes and movies in which altered   
   >> timelines were corrected   
   >   
   > In otherwords exactly like all the other movies and TV episodes where   
   > bad things happen and don't unhappen. Kirk doesn't order the enterpise   
   > to sling shot around the sun every time a red shirt dies. Nor did they   
   > try to undo all the destruction caused by V'ger or Khan or when the   
   > Klingon moon blew-up or any number of cases when bad things happened   
   > on a large scale. And you really want to know why? Because there's no   
   > drama in it if they did.   
      
   There once was a show that was based on such a premise: '7 Days'.   
   Not the best ever, but I think the actors did their best and that lady was   
   hot.   
      
   --   
   Wouter Valentijn www.j3v.net   
      
   Buffy: This is the Initiative Xander.  Military guys and scientists do not   
   make out with each other.   
   Xander: Well maybe that's wrong with the world. Ever think about that?   
      
   'Buffy the Vampire Slayer 4x14: Goodbye Iowa'   
      
   liam=mail   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)