dc887e26   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos, rec.arts.sf.movies, alt.humor.puns   
   XPost: alt.humor   
   From: not@chance.dude   
      
   "selaboc"   
    "Wickeddoll"wrote:   
   >> > Then you haven't been reading his posts. He;d prefer they had "instead   
   >> > done a movie in which Spock and the Next-Gen crew try to save Romulus   
   >> > from a supernova." He keeps looking for ways to undo the movie becuase   
   >> > he does not like the fact that they created a new timeline in which   
   >> > Vulcan is destroyed.   
   >>   
   >> Then it sounds more like he didn't like just *one* aspect of the movie,   
   >> not   
   >> the entire thing.  I'm not trying to defend anyone here, I'm just trying   
   >> to   
   >> look at it from Tim's POV.   
   >   
   > Yeah, if you count the entire premise of the movie as "just *one*   
   > aspect". He wanted an entirely different movie than the one we got   
   > (remember he'd have prefer they "instead done a movie in which Spock   
   > and the Next-Gen crew try to save Romulus from a supernova."). Which   
   > is all fine and good, but no need to spend weeks posting variations of   
   > that same theme. After the 20th iteration, it gets to be a bit beyond   
   > the pale.   
   >   
      
   Well, even I admitted I thought he was overdoing it with the scenarios, but   
   I still think he liked the movie.  He just seems to be having a lot of   
   racing thoughts on the subject.   
      
   Natalie   
   --   
   "Wicked little doll, you have no soul"   
   (David Byrne, 1997)   
      
   http://www.supernaturalusa.net   
   http://www.wegrokspock.net   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)