Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.tv.star-trek    |    William Shatner told 'em to get a life    |    5,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,804 of 5,051    |
|    J. Clarke to All    |
|    Re: Star Trek: Discovery star replies to    |
|    26 Jun 17 22:57:11    |
      XPost: alt.startrek, rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv       XPost: rec.arts.startrek.current       From: j.clarke.873638@gmail.com              In article <1gvjcetu3aq2w$.dlg@starfist.thorsfinni>, starfist@gmail.invalid       says...       >       > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:23:18 -0400, Obveeus wrote:       >       > > Using a phaser that looks closer to STAR TREK (The Original Series)       > > rather than the phaser from the scrapped pilot stuff in The Cage episode       > > isn't likely to offend many people beyond the few here who are just       > > going to insist on being offended by anything/everything with the new       > > series. The new show may suck royally and it may be entirely irrelevant       > > since few people will be watching anyway, but people need to find better       > > things to gripe about.       >       > Personally, I couldn't care less that the visual effects are       > different. I am perfectly fine with that. It doesn't bother me at       > all if the bridge looks more advanced or the Klingons look a little       > different. Don't care.       >       > My complaint (probably too strong a word, it's just a show) is that       > the people making the show have made a concerted effort to make big       > social justice BS a huge issue for it, to the point of re-writing       > canonical history of the Trek universe to do it, and to make this       > totally unrealistic view of no straight white males in sight 10 years       > before Kirk. That's a nonstarter for good fiction especially in an       > established universe. They have an agenda to push. There were some       > horrible agenda EPISODES of other Trek, like The Outcast, where they       > basically tell us that Riker was attracted to someone with an       > underdeveloped penis and you should be happy about that, but that was       > one (awful) episode. These guys are going all in on in-your-face       > snowflake-revolution-in-space, and screw your Trek timeline, we are       > going to shove all of our SJW wet dreams into this show because it's       > better than what was already there.              I don't know if you've noticed but Abrams et al are _mocking_ Trek. And       apparently one of the things they're mocking is the social justice aspects.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca